MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Absolute measurement of absorbed dose to water for γ-ray of 60Co by water calorimetry

2024· article· en· W6884782033 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbsorbed dosePercentage depth dose curveDosimeterDose profileIonization chamberKermaDosimetryTraceabilityPrimary standard

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundMost of domestic radiation therapy doses can only be traced back to air kerma of 60Co γ-ray at present in China. The uncertainty of directly tracing radiation therapy dose to absorbed dose to water is much smaller compared to tracing radiation therapy dose to air kerma, which must be converted to absorbed dose to water.PurposeThis study aims to solve the problem of traceability and transfer of 60Co γ-ray absorbed dose to water, as well as the problem that the dose measurement of radiotherapy cannot be directly traced through the absorbed dose to water, NIMTT (National Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology) has established an absolute measurement device of 60Co γ-ray absorbed dose to water.MethodsAn absolute measurement device of 60Co γ-ray absorbed dose to water was established by National Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology (NIMTT) using water calorimeterfor direct measurement of absorbed dose to water. The correction factors for water absorbed dose measurement were obtained by experimental and simulation methods. A comparison of laboratory reproducing results was made between NIMTT and NRC (National Research Council, Canada) using the method of transmitting standard to further verify the accuracy and consistency of the measurement of 60Co γ-ray absorbed dose to water. Two PTW ionization chambers were used as the transfer standard.ResultsThe reproduced results of two laboratories for absolute measurement of 60Co γ-ray absorbed dose to water are consistent within the relative standard uncertainty of 0.71%, and the normalized error value of En is -0.45.ConclusionsThe comparison results have verified that NIMTT laboratory has the ability of traceability and transmission of absorbed dose to water. The results of this study provide a reference for the absolute measurement of absorbed dose to water for 60Co γ-ray.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→