MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6886045524 · doi:10.14288/1.0447580

Navigating medical racism : how Black Canadian women experience reproductive healthcare in Canada

2024· article· en· W6886045524 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRacial and Ethnic Identity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismHealth careHealth equityBlack womenIntersectionalitySocioeconomic statusQualitative researchPrejudice (legal term)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black women in the United States die of pregnancy-related causes at a three times higher rate than white women, regardless of the mother’s socioeconomic status. Systemic medical racism contributes to high morbidity and mortality rates among Black populations. Currently, there is a lack of race-based data collected in Canada. Given there is evidence of medical racism experienced by Black women in the United States, Black Canadian women may experience medical racism within the Canadian healthcare system. This study aims to understand how Black Canadian women navigate and manage obstetric racism in reproductive healthcare contexts. Trauma-informed intersectional feminist research practices empower and encourage Black women to share their experiences. Qualitative descriptive was used to understand how Black women experience medical racism. Black women living in Canada actively participated in twenty-five in-depth one-on-one interviews. Five themes include: 1) Black women anticipate experiencing some form of discrimination given the known health inequalities in the U.S., 2) healthcare providers consistently dismiss Black women’s pain. 3) healthcare providers’ perception of Black women affects their care, 4) increased need for Black representation in reproductive healthcare providers, and 5) patient-centred care improves Black women’s wellbeing. This study findings show that, despite implementing strategies to overcome racism and discrimination, participants still endure forms of systemic racism. Healthcare providers need to be aware that Black women experience health disparities due to a providers’ personal bias and the systemic barriers that exist in the healthcare system. Healthcare providers must understand that Black women may withhold health information to protect themselves from negative stereotypes. Healthcare providers need training on cultural safety to recognize their implicit biases and to provide safe and equitable care. Recruiting medical professionals who reflect racially underrepresented backgrounds will help to address systemic barriers in healthcare. The evidence suggests that Black Canadian women experience medical obstetric racism even with a successful pregnancy and delivery. The Canadian healthcare system must be aware of these issues and advocate for Black Canadian women to reduce instances of medical racism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0380.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchFrench-language works237,207