MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6886055466 · doi:10.14288/hfjc.v14i3.672

Roles of privilege-disadvantage in meeting 24-Hour Movement Guidelines among South Korean adolescents during COVID-19

2021· article· en· W6886055466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModerationRecreationPandemicPhysical activitySleep (system call)Ethnic group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Adherence to physical activity (PA), recreational screen time (ST) and sleep recommendations within Canada’s 24-Hour Movement Guidelines have been consistently low among South Korean adolescents, with disparities across different factors that indicate social privilege-disadvantage (e.g., gender). COVID-19 may have exacerbated such disparities. Purpose: To examine intersectional correlates of meeting the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines among South Korean adolescents. Methods: Self-reported, population-based data from 44,198 adolescents (12-18 years) who participated in the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey 2020 were used. Exposure included gender, effect modifiers included family economic status (FES), financial impacts due to COVID-19, and academic performance, and outcomes included meeting individual recommendations within the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines. Moderation analyses were conducted. Results: Overall, girls were less likely to meet PA and sleep recommendations than boys. High academic performance was associated with not meeting PA and sleep recommendations but with meeting the ST recommendation. Compared to girls with low FES, boys with high FES were more likely to meet the ST recommendation (OR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.11–1.39). Compared to girls with low academic performance, girls (OR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.23–1.44) and boys (OR: 1.48, 95%CI: 1.36–1.62) with high academic performance were more likely to meet the ST recommendation. Conclusions: Consistent with pre-COVID data, gender disparities in meeting PA and sleep recommendations were observed, but not for ST during the COVID-19 pandemic among South Korean adolescents. Boy gender with high FES as well as high academic performance, regardless of gender, has served as advantage in meeting the ST recommendation. Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→