MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6887661732 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/v6kbm

Access to autism spectrum disorder services for marginalized families in Canada: a scoping review protocol

2023· other· en· W6887661732 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)Autism spectrum disorderService providerService (business)Ethnic groupConfidentialitySystematic reviewProtocol (science)Qualitative research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to assess the extent of the literature on racially or ethnically marginalized families’ access to, utilization, and experiences with ASD services for their child in Canada. Our review will summarize key findings, compare the reported experiences of different marginalized populations to identify similarities and differences, and highlight gaps in the present literature. This review will enable us to better understand facilitators and barriers to ASD service access/use, and thus provide evidence-based recommendations to improve Canadian service provision, policy, and research. INTRODUCTION: Navigating support services for a child with ASD can be challenging for any family, especially for families who belong to historically marginalized communities. Previous systematic reviews have identified common barriers immigrant and underserved parents face when accessing ASD services for their child – such as language barriers, limited health literacy, and unfamiliarity with the healthcare system. However, the experiences of racially or ethnically marginalized families with a child with ASD in Canada have not been comprehensively reviewed. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Qualitative literature describing the experiences of marginalized families (i.e., under-represented racial/ethnic groups, immigrant, refugee) in Canada with accessing and/or using ASD services for their child under 18 years of age will be included. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science will be conducted by a research librarian in August 2023. Studies will not be limited by publication date. English and French-language studies will be included. Following the search, title and abstract screening, then full-text screening will be conducted independently and in duplicate to assess eligibility of search results against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or adjudicated by a third reviewer. Finally, data will be extracted from included papers independently and in duplicate using a data extraction tool developed a priori. Included studies will also be critically appraised for methodological quality, independently and in duplicate, using the CASP qualitative checklist. All results will subsequently be presented in the final scoping review.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0120.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207