Care for Newborns and Infants in Mobile Emergency Care: SCOPING REVIEW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
objective Identify and synthesize scientific evidence on the care of newborns and infants in the Mobile Emergency Care Service. Question formulation P (Population) – newborns and infants; C (Concept) – care/assistance from the healthcare professional; C (Context) – Mobile Emergency Care Service. What healthcare professional care is relevant, in the context of the Mobile Emergency Care Service, to newborns and infants? What health professional behaviors are important in the Mobile Emergency Care Service for newborns and infants? Inclusion criteria Will be included: research published in full in English, Spanish and Portuguese; which deal with the care of healthcare professionals, in the context of the Mobile Emergency Care Service, for newborns and infants. Time limit, from Ordinance No. 1,600, of July 7, 2011; which reformulates the National Emergency Care Policy and establishes the Emergency Care Network in the Unified Health System (SUS), that is, from 2011. Exclusion criteria The following will be excluded: single case studies, editorials, experience reports, event annals, theoretical essays. Data collect Data base: - Cummulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); - Medline via National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health (PubMed); - Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), - SCOPUS; - Web of Science; - Embase; - Cochrane Library. Search in gray literature: - CAPES Theses and Dissertations Catalog - DART-Europe E-Theses Portal - Electronic Theses Online Service (EThOS) - Portuguese Open Access Scientific Repository (RCAAP) - National ETD Portal - Theses Canada - Latin American Thesis Portal - World Cat Dissertations and Theses • Identification of descriptors and keywords Descriptors and keywords used in studies that address the topic of interest based on the combination of MeSH identified for the research mnemonic: (Infant, Newborn OR Infant, Premature OR Infant, Very Low Birth Weight OR Infant, Extremely Premature OR Infant, Large for Gestational Age OR Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight OR Infant OR Infant Care OR Sudden Infant Death OR Infant, Postmature OR Brief, Resolved, Unexplained Event) AND (Care OR Patient Care Bundles OR Medical Care OR Critical Care Outcomes OR Critical Care OR Postnatal Care OR Intensive Care Units, Neonatal OR Subacute Care, OR Transitional Care, OR Secondary Care, OR Telemedicine Emergency Care OR Patient Care Management OR Therapeutic Approaches) AND (Ambulances OR Emergency Mobile Units OR Mobile Emergency Units OR Mobile Emergency Service OR Emergency medical assistance service OR Mobile Health Units OR Prehospital Care OR Emergency Medical Services OR Emergency Medicine OR SAMU).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.062 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.018 | 0.017 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".