The primary care provider role in the early intervention of depression and suicidal behaviours in youth: a scoping review protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: To review and synthesize evidence relating to the role of nurse practitioners and family physicians in the early intervention of depression and suicidal behaviours in youth within Canada. Design: The protocol for this scoping review was developed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodologic guidance for scoping reviews. Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and APA PsycInfo databases will be searched. Abstracts will be assessed for eligibility and full texts will be retrieved if they meet the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will independently extract the data from identified studies using a data extraction form, and the results will be summarized descriptively and in tabular format. Discussion: Though there is consensus that primary care providers (PCPs) have a role in the early detection and treatment of depression and suicidal behaviours, determining the details of what this role entails has been a challenge. There is also a lack of literature regarding this topic specific to both youth populations and the Canadian primary care context. An increased understanding of PCPs’ role in addressing youth depression and suicidal behaviours, as well as the stresses related to this role, can inform strategies for supporting PCPs. Impact: The findings from this review can inform healthcare policies, continuing education for nurse practitioners and family physicians, and nursing practices to support those providing early detection and treatment. Supporting PCPs in carrying out this role can increase the number of youths who receive timely intervention, in turn reducing youth morbidity and mortality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".