MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6887751401 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/vq2c8

Influence of Colleague and Manager Autonomy Support on Work Satisfaction and Turnover Intention of Philippine Corporate Employees: A Conceptual Replication Study

2025· other· en· W6887751401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyOutcome (game theory)Replication (statistics)Work (physics)Scale (ratio)Job satisfactionSuicidal ideationConceptual model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original study of Moreau & Mageau (2012) investigated the effects of Autonomy Support from a) colleagues and b) managers, on work outcomes (work satisfaction and intent to leave) and psychological health (subjective well-being, psychological distress, suicidal ideation) of newcomer health professionals (in the fields of dentistry, medicine, veterinary medicine) in Canada. Results indicate that Perceived Autonomy Support (from both colleagues and managers) positively predicts work satisfaction and subjective well-being, and negatively predicts intent to leave, psychological distress, and suicidal ideation. Colleague autonomy support was also found to have a more significant prediction effect compared to manager autonomy support, on work satisfaction (1%), subjective well-being (2%), and suicidal ideation (2%). This conceptual replication study seeks to investigate if support for Autonomy (of Basic Psychological Need Theory, under Self-Determination Theory) from a) colleagues and b) managers, has a similar relationship with the work-related outcome variables of work satisfaction and turnover intention when it comes to corporate professionals in the Philippines. Differences between the current replication study and the original study include focusing on the work-related outcome variables, replacement of a work-related outcome variable (turnover intention replacing intent to leave), measures (TIS-6 is used to measure turnover intention; Work Climate Questionnaire replacing Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Employees or PASS-E), sampling methods, and characteristics of participants. Thus, this study seeks to extend the results of Moreau & Mageau (2012) to a new population, work setting, measures, and a similar work-related outcome variable (turnover intention). Results of this replication study have a possibility of differing from the original study due to characteristics of the sampled population (Filipinos instead of Canadians) and nature of work (corporate professionals instead of health professionals), as differences in culture and work setting may consequently result in differences when it comes to need for autonomy, as well as the resulting work-related outcome variables of work satisfaction and turnover intention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207