MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6887873073 · doi:10.17638/03180412

Food Web Structure in the Canadian Subarctic: Implications for Harp Seals

2023· article· en· W6887873073 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Liverpool · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood webTrophic levelZooplanktonArcticEcosystemIsotope analysisMarine ecosystemPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic is warming by nearly four times the rate of the global average, leading to changing ocean conditions that have far-reaching consequences for marine ecosystems. Effective ecosystem-based management strategies are therefore essential for preserving the health and resilience of these ecosystems amidst the challenges posed by climate change. Subarctic regions serve as an interface between Arctic and temperate waters, offering a unique and accessible setting to observe marine populations at the fringes of their respective ecosystems and to monitor their responses to environmental shifts. The Newfoundland shelf in the Northwest Atlantic (NWA) is a highly productive region of the subarctic, supporting multiple commercial fisheries, that has experienced considerable restructuring of its marine food web since the early 1990s. Recent observations of variability in the ice conditions (e.g., timing of retreat, extent and thickness), zooplankton community composition, fish biomass and marine mammal population dynamics highlight the need for a holistic analysis of the NWA shelf food web that incorporates multiple functional groups and trophic levels. For this PhD thesis, I used stable isotope analysis of bulk tissues and individual amino acids to: (1) Quantify trophic discrimination factors (TDFs) for multiple functional groups and tissues, and found that TDFs did not differ between tissues, but did decrease with increasing trophic position (TP), being largest in zooplankton (6.9‰) and lowest in harp seals (3.1‰). Though speculative, the mechanisms likely responsible for this are diet quality and mode of excretion (urea/uric acid vs. ammonia). This has implications for accurate calculations of TP and our interpretations of food web structure more broadly. (2) Characterise the structure of the NWA food web between 2012 and 2018. The isotopic baseline, as proxied by the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of LiverpoolSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207