MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6887894738 · doi:10.17920/g9ps57

Preserving At Risk Tobacco Control Policy Resources

2008· other· en· W6887894738 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2008
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmokeless tobaccoTobacco industryTobacco controlGovernment (linguistics)SAFERResource (disambiguation)Public healthControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This proposal is submitted to further the TRDRP aim “to build the research infrastructure in California critical for comprehensive research into tobacco-related diseases and tobacco use and control.” This proposal is a request to continue funding a research resource not a request to fund research. The Library at the University of California, San Francisco has a long history in collecting, organizing, preserving and disseminating tobacco industry documents and related primary source materials, with an emphasis on issues in California. This project will add high-value, at-risk materials to the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu); materials that support research by scholars, high school and college students, public policy makers, and advocates. Unless prompt action is taken to capture and preserve these materials now, it is likely they will be lost. The Minnesota Depository, the location for a large quantity of documents, is scheduled to close in 2008 and the web site hosting selected documents is likely to close soon due to lack of funding. The specific aims of this project are to: 1. Collect U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company documents. 2. Provide a permanent digital home for orphan tobacco company documents. 3. Make accessible tobacco industry produced audio and video tapes. We carefully selected the following material because of its value to the research community and its potential impact on public health for the citizens of California. U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company Tobacco control researchers are increasingly interested in investigating the tobacco industry’s development, testing, marketing and sales of smokeless tobacco products as manufacturers test market these products as safer alternatives to cigarettes and for use in smoke-free buildings. We will acquire, digitize and catalog roughly 47 boxes (estimated 150,000 pages) of original onion-skin invoices, oversized ledgers, and other similar materials and 100 audiotapes and 115 videotapes. Orphan Documents We will add three sets of orphan documents to LTDL. 1. The Tobacco Institute -- over 1 million documents (est. 4 million pages) obtained by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute (in conjunction with the New York State Archives) describing the industry’s political and scientific activities. 2. Pollay Advertising -- 7,500 images from Richard Pollay's collection of tobacco company advertising, promotion and issue ads showing how the industry uses advertising to recruit new smokers despite its claim that it is geared towards getting smokers to switch brands. 3. Canadian Tobacco Trials -- 48,000 pages of court documents from two tobacco industry challenges to Canadian tobacco control legislation covering industry advertising and freedom of speech, industry sponsorship of scientific research, and federal regulation. Audio and video tapes We will obtain 1,975 tobacco industry audio and video tapes, including material on youth smoking prevention programs and other public relations efforts. We have also acquired 470 videotapes produced by the British American Tobacco Company and 2,000 videotapes from the Tobacco Institute. We will catalog and make selections from this material, and the 215 USSTC tapes, accessible for immediate viewing through the UCSF Tobacco Industry collections on the Internet Archive. In total this proposal will add 4,205,500 pages and 2,710 audio and video tapes to the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library website. These are significant, unique materials that will support new research and advocacy efforts in California.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1350.062

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalifornia Digital LibrarySame topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207