Labour Force Sample Survey 3rd quarter 1988 - 4th quarter 1989, panel file, recoded
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SSB has conducted official quarterly labor force surveys (LFS) as of Q1 1972. The survey aims to provide labor authorities and others knowledge about the occupational structure of population and development over time. The surveys provide the basis and statistical material for occupational forecasting and labor market research. In the LFS respondents are interviewed two consecutive quarters, then after two more quarters they are interviewed again in two consecutive quarters. Labour Force Survey 1972 is the first complete LFS year long survey. Originally it was intended that such statistics would be a more analytical supplement to the monthly employment statistics based on the insurance fund membership files. The insurance fund-based statistics, however, fell away when health insurance was included in the National Insurance Scheme from 1 January 1971, the LFS has gradually evolved to become the main source of knowledge about the state of the labor market. General information on the Labour Force Survey: http://www.nsd.uib.no/data/ny_individ/norStudy/aku.html Overview of LFS panels with detailed explanation for panel files: Group |1980|1981|1982|1983 |1984|1985|1986|1987|1988 |1989|1990 Quarter 1234 |1234|1234|1234 |1234|1234 |1234|1234|1234|1234|1234 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 60 |____|____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____|____| 601_1 = 1987,1 61 |____|____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____|____| 601_2 = 1987,2 62 |____|____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____|____| 601_3 = 1987,3 63 |____|____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____|____| 601_4 = 1987,4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 64 |____|____|____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____| 603_1 = 1988,1 65 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____| 603_2 = 1988,2 66 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____| 603_3 = 1988,3 67 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____| 603_4 = 1988,4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 68 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____| 605 = 1989,1 69 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____| 607 = 1989,2 70 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____| 609 = 1989,3 71 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____| 610 = 1989,4 Panel files are created by linking four interviews from an ordinary interview round in LFS. In the table above this means that one could connect all the groups (lines) marked X. Participation 4 times is used as a selection criterion. In 1975 there was a break in the Panel systematics, see 1975. With the Labour Force Survey 1976, it adopted a slightly modified questionnaire and returned to the original six-quarter rotation plan, which has been stable since. Looking at a particular column, for example. Q1 1988, we see that one quarter of respondents are included for 4th time, 3rd time etc, put together they summarise the total material for one quarter. Quarterly weighting allows one such quarter (column) can be balanced with national figures. Taking 4 quarters and add them toghether into one year, the quarter weights must be divided by 4 to give the correct weighted figures for vintage. Panel files go in the other direction (horizontally) and each panel will have four weights, one for each quarter, and although they do not differ much they will be prepared independently and each weight should be used only for data made from the quarterly weight. Weighted figures counts as a group, ie approximately 25% of the total quarterly sample and must therefore multiply by 4 to get approximately the national quarterly. By "almost national quarterly" it means that since panel connectors implies a specific selection process, therefore it may appear minor differences from the weighted national numbers one gets for each quarter This panel file includes my group 71 in the table. The weights in the original file is prepared for use monthly quarterly weights are developed by dividing weight in 3 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.075 | 0.059 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".