MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of a Prototype Pulsed Power Supply using SiC-MOSFETs for a Fast Kicker System in KEK-PF

2023· article· en· W6888111941 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJACOW · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulsed powerPower (physics)Switched-mode power supplyPulse repetition frequencySwitched-mode power supply applicationsJitterVoltageHigh voltageLinear particle accelerator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are developing a fast pulsed power supply using Silicon Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs for a camshaft bunch kicker in KEK-PF. In the kicker system, the pulsed power supply needs to generate a high-precision short pulse with high power. A high repetition rate is also required due to the short circumference of the KEK-PF storage ring of 187 m. Therefore, the target specifications are 500 A pulsed current within a 1% uncertainty, a 100 ns pulse width, a timing jitter of less than 300 ps, a 15 kV voltage resistance, and a 1 MHz repetition rate. In addition, the power supply should have a high radiation resistivity because the power supply will be placed near the accelerator ring to reduce transmission impedance. To achieve the requirements, we have newly started the development of a pulsed power supply with a solid-state switching module using SiC-MOSFETs. We first developed a prototype power supply with a 14 kV switching module consisting of 16 SiC-MOSFETs in series. We confirmed the prototype power supply could deliver half-sine pulses with stable operation at a low repetition rate. The prototype power supply was also tested near the accelerator ring and worked successfully for about two months. We report the performance of the prototype pulsed power supply using SiC-MOSFETs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACOWSame topicPulsed Power Technology ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207