Dans l'intérêt de qui ? Regard sur l'expérience d'une mère d'enfant victime d'agression sexuelle ayant reçu des services d'une Société d'aide à l'enfance en Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les agressions sexuelles sont un sujet très délicat, notamment lorsqu’il est question de jeunes victimes. Au Canada, les enfants de 13 ans ou moins représentent la moitié (50 %) de toutes les victimes d'agression sexuelle (Statistique Canada, 2017). Selon les données de la plus récente Enquête sociale générale sur la sécurité des Canadiens, en 2014 seulement 1 incident d'agression sexuelle sur 20 avait été signalé à la police. Lors d’allégation d’agression sexuelle contre un enfant, les services de la protection de l’enfance ont le devoir d’agir le plus rapidement possible afin d’éviter que l’enfant ne soit agressé à nouveau. La littérature démontre que de grandes responsabilités pèsent sur les épaules de la mère et cela, même si le père n’était pas l’auteur des agressions. Les stéréotypes de genre qui circulent dans la société concernant la nature des femmes à être douces, attentionnées et passives, ont une influence considérable sur l’intervention auprès de ces familles. Ainsi, il existe de grandes attentes auprès de ces femmes, tel que, croire, protéger et supporter son enfant lors du dévoilement. À partir d’une analyse féministe, cette recherche porte un regard critique sur l’expérience d’une mère d’un enfant victime d’agression sexuelle ayant reçu des services d’une Société d’aide à l’enfance en Ontario. Lorsque les services de protection interviennent auprès d’enfants victimes d’agressions sexuelles, les besoins des mères ne sont pas toujours pris en compte. De plus, les mères sont facilement étiquetées d’aliénantes par les professionnel(les) et elles sont blâmées lorsqu’elle tente de protéger leur enfant. Au final, cette recherche propose quelques recommandations pour la pratique telle l’implantation d’un modèle de services intersectoriels destinés aux enfants victimes d’agression sexuelle. Mots-clés : Agression sexuelle, féminisme, maternité, signalement, Société d’aide à l’enfance, services de protection. Sexual violence is a very sensitive issue, especially when it comes to young victims. In Canada, children aged 13 and under account for half (50%) victims of sexual assault (Statistique Canada, 2017). According to data from the most recent General Social Survey on the Safety of Canadians, in 2014 only 1 in 20 sexual assault incidents had been reported to the police. In the case of allegations of sexual assault against a child, child protection services have a duty to act as quickly as possible to prevent the child from being assaulted again. The literature shows that great responsibilities weigh on the mother's shoulders, even if the father was not the perpetrator of the assaults. Gender stereotypes in society about the nature of women being gentle, caring and passive have a considerable influence on intervention with these families. Thus, there are high expectations among these women, such as, believe, protect and support their child at the unveiling. Based on a feminist analysis, this research takes a critical look at the experience of a mother of a child who has been sexually assaulted and has received services from a Children's Aid Society in Ontario. When protective services work with child victims of sexual assault, the needs of mothers are not always taken into account. Also, mothers are easily labelled alienating by professionals and are blamed when they try to protect their child. This research proposes some recommendations for practice such as the implementation of a cross-sector service model for children who are victims of sexual assault. Keywords : Sexual assault, feminism, maternity, reporting, Children’s Aid Society, protection services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".