MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6888495932 · doi:10.20381/ruor-26986

“Tokyo, 1947”: Cultural Retrospection and the Westernization of Postwar Japan in Lynne Kutsukake’s The Translation of Love

2021· other· en· W6888495932 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWesternizationDepictionPeriod (music)SanderIdentity (music)Interpretation (philosophy)World War IIChina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As one of the first novels to offer an alternative depiction of postwar Japan, Canadian writer Lynne Kutsukake’s novel The Translation of Love follows five protagonists. These characters experience life in a postwar Tokyo while shaped by their own experience of World War II’s cultural memory. Japanese nationals and the Japanese community abroad in the U.S. and Canada are the work’s central focus. Japan’s occupation by American forces overhauled its traditional way of life for Westernization and inevitable identity clashes. Amid these sociopolitical and cultural changes, I first provide a historical overview of pre-and post-World War II to supplement the narrative’s brief references to the era before providing a literary analysis through postcolonial and feminist theory. The second chapter applies the theories of Homi K. Bhabha’s third space, Sander Gilman’s stereotyping, and Edward Said’s Other to explore how Tokyo’s transformation into a hybridised space gives way to racial prejudice. In the final chapter, the feminist thought of Luce Irigaray’s approach to women’s roles in patriarchy, along with Laura Mulvey’s reflections on the male gaze, highlight Japanese women’s contact with gender disparity as they learn how to act and be perceived as modern women. This project serves as an early contribution to discussions on Kutsukake’s work to illustrate its function as a critical response to a tumultuous period in Japan’s history in which the U.S. and Canada also make their presence known.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0220.020
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)→French-language works237,207→