MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888545498 · doi:10.20381/ruor-30322

The Relationship Between Parity Status and Musculoskeletal Injury Prevalence in Female Members of the Canadian Armed Forces

2024· article· en· W6888545498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa - Library · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParity (physics)SquatMusculoskeletal injuryBack injuryLogistic regressionHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKi) place a significant burden on females in arduous occupations, like military service members, first responders (public safety personnel), and healthcare workers. In the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), females are more likely to release due to an MSKi than their male peers, and male healthcare workers demonstrate a lower relative risk for all injuries. Female reproductive health (e.g., pregnancy) may contribute to the sex-disparities in MSKi prevalence, but the relationship between parity status and MSKi has not been explored. The multistage approach applied to examine the relationship between parity status and MSKi in CAF members was as follows: (i) Self-reported MSKi and reproductive health data were collected via an online questionnaire and analyzed using chi-square and logistic regression tests. (ii) Physical testing to assess flexibility (sit-and-reach), muscular power (long jump and medicine ball throw), movement competency (bodyweight overhead squat test), muscular strength (4 repetition maximum back squat and bench press), muscular endurance (Biering-Sorenson test, single-leg wall sit, and push-ups), aerobic capacity (graded treadmill VO_2max test). MSKi history and reproductive health data were collected via a pre-screening questionnaire. Physical fitness was compared by parity status and MSKi history using one and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. (iii) A study similar to step ii was conducted in females employed as first responders or healthcare providers. (iv) A 3-way ANOVA was performed to compare the CAF and non-military samples from steps ii and iii. Parous CAF members were more likely to sustain repetitive strain injuries (overall and at the wrist and foot) compared to nulliparous peers. When matched for injury history, parous CAF members performed better in upper body muscular endurance, lower back muscular endurance, and lower body muscular strength. Conversely, the parous group in the non-military study participants demonstrated inferior performance in lower body power, lower back endurance, and lower body and upper body strength. Parity status should be considered independently and in conjunction with MSKi when developing support initiatives for females employed in both military and non-military contexts, however, given the opposing findings regarding fitness performance, research specific to the CAF is needed to inform policy and evidence-based practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa - LibrarySame topicOccupational Health and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207