MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888731345 · doi:10.21966/7qnv-6y88

Biogeochemical Sampling of Streams in the Kwakshua Watersheds of Calvert and Hecate Islands, BC: 2013-2019

2013· dataset· en· W6888731345 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueHakai Institute · 2013
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogeochemical cycleDissolved organic carbonSTREAMSTotal organic carbonHydrology (agriculture)Sampling (signal processing)AbsorbanceOrganic matterCarbon fibers

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains the analytical results of freshwater biogeochemical samples collected on Calvert and Hecate Islands on the central coast of British Columbia, Canada, from April 2013 to December 2019. Samples were collected, approximately monthly, year round at the stream outlets of the seven largest watersheds, which are gauged as part of the Kwakshua Watersheds Observatory. The samples were analyzed for dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration and stable isotopes, particulate organic carbon and nitrogen (POC and PON) concentration and isotopes, dissolved organic matter (DOM) composition (via metrics of absorbance and fluorescence), total, dissolved, and inorganic nutrients, metals and major ions, water isotopes, and total suspended solids (TSS). Complimenting each water chemistry sample, we measured electrical conductivity, temperature, pH, oxidation reduction potential (ORP), and dissolved oxygen in-situ with a hand-held sensor. General field methods From the Calvert Island field station, each stream was accessed by a short boat ride (~10 min). The field team was dropped on land and walked up-stream to the pre-established sampling location, above tidal influence. For most sample types, water was filtered streamside, using a 0.45 µm filter attached to a syringe. POC, PON, and TSS samples, however, were brought back to the laboratory, to be filtered via vacuum filtration, using a grade GF/F 0.7 µm filter. The samples were then preserved, according to the Hakai preservation protocol before being sent to external analytical laboratories for analysis. The absorbance and fluorescence samples as well as TSS samples were analyzed on site by Hakai technicians. The resulting data were reviewed and flagged following our standard quality control (QC) procedures. This data package contains the quality controlled data as well as detailed documentation of the methods used to collect, analyze, and QC the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHakai InstituteFrench-language works237,207