The Philosophy of Education for the Future from the Point of View of Thomas De Koninck
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thomas de Conanque is a contemporary Canadian philosopher who has published many books and treatises and has done a lot of research in the field of philosophy. What is important for De Koninck is to preserve human dignity in any field and any position. According to him, it is important, above all else, is the preservation of human value in every field, from medicine, economics, and politics to education. Many other philosophers and writers such as Aristotle, Plato, Hegel, Saint-Exupéry and Shakespeare are among the guides of De Koninck in the formation and dissemination of his philosophical ideas. He also conducts research in understanding the philosophy of education, especially about children and adolescents. What this philosopher shows us is that the philosophy of education is not only related to the present and the 21st century, but since the ancient Greek, there has been thought and investigation in this matter and it has been necessary; But it should not be forgotten that it has always been changing and the surrounding environment has challenged it many times. Multiple phenomenes are involved in the philosophy of education. From human body and biology to his soul and emotions. Also, there are various tools to teach science as best as possible, such as music or literature. In this research, an attempt is made to understand the ideas of this contemporary philosopher about the philosophy of education, to find out how to provide a deeper, more stable and more useful education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it