DimenFix: a Novel Meta-Dimensionality Reduction Strategy for Feature Preservation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dimensionality Reduction (DR) methods have become essential tools for the data analysis toolbox. Typically, DR methods combine features of a multi-variate dataset to produce dimensions in a reduced space, preserving some data properties, usually pairwise distances or local neighborhoods. Preserving such properties makes DR methods attractive, but it is also one of their weaknesses. When calculating the embedded dimensions, through usually non-linear strategies, the original feature values are lost and not explicitly represented in the spatialization of the produced layouts, making it challenging to verify the features' contribution to the attained representations. Some strategies have been proposed to tackle this issue, such as coloring the DR layout or generating explanations. Still, they are post-processes, so specific features (values) are not guaranteed to be preserved or represented. This paper proposes DimenFix, a novel meta-DR strategy that explicitly preserves the values of a particular feature or external data (e.g., class, time, or ranking) in one of the embedded dimensions. DimenFix works with virtually any gradient-descent DR method and, in our results, has shown to be capable of representing features without heavily impacting distance or neighborhood preservation, allowing for creating hybrid layouts joining characteristics of scatter plots and DR methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it