Missional readiness : a postfoundational, practical theological analysis of the role of mission in leadership training within The Salvation Army in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Training leaders for long term Christian ministry is becoming an increasingly complex problem in a post-Christian world. At the same time, there has never been a more exciting time to train for Christian ministry. In a world that is increasingly superficial, Christianity can offer a deep meaning to life. Added to this is the fact that mission is no longer a matter of unimaginable travel to the ends of the earth since the world is in fact coming to our doorstep. The question is “what should future pastors and church leaders be taught to meet the needs of the current cultural reality?” The research is a postfoundational practical theological analysis of the curriculum used to train Salvation Army leaders within a postmodern Canadian context. The research also includes the contributions of research partners, recently commissioned Salvation Army officers, through their responses to questions about the missional aspect of their training. The research engages in an interdisciplinary dialogue with social science, philosophy, educational sciences, and theology to enrich the study and thicken the research narrative. This brought to light the history of theological education, the effects of postmodernism on society, the ethos of The Salvation Army, and new directions that theological education and the training of ministers of the Gospel has taken in recent years. It also stressed the importance of the theology of mission within the curriculum of theological institutions and showed how the lack of mission teaching has become the norm in many of these institutions. The research shows that The Salvation Army College for Officer Training in Canada is one such institution. The lack of theology of mission in the curriculum has adversely affected how the College for Officer Training teaches missiology to future ministers and ultimately this has influenced the local church’s ability to effectively engage in mission within their context. Based on the findings, this research offers a possible way forward, based on a missional hermeneutic, enhancing the training of Salvation Army officers’ competencies and capacities to enable them to fully engage in mission within their context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".