Destabilising the Discourses of Psychopathy Through Contemporary Canadian and US Women’s Writing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this thesis, I explore twelve contemporary novels by women from the US and Canada with the objective of analysing, exposing, and unsettling the varied and often harmful discourses of psychopathy. Through an examination of contemporary fiction, I demonstrate that archaic and dehumanising stereotypes are embedded in these discourses. The twelve novels I examine range from bestsellers to independent press releases that employ styles associated with psychological terror to speculative fiction, true crime, and the police procedural. I provide a broad picture of how contemporary Canadian and US women’s fiction deploys the popular and prevalent discourses of psychopathy in vastly differing ways. In doing so, I illustrate how women’s fiction employs psychopath imagery, motifs, and language to reinforce as well as to destabilise dominant formations of class, race, and gender and stereotypes about ‘bad’ mothers, ‘crazy’ women, monstrous serial killers and sex offenders, and people diagnosed as autistic. Taking a comparative and thematic approach, I organise my analysis through four chapters structured by mode and theme. Chapter one, on serial killer fiction, interrogates the depiction of the serial murderer and murderous culture in Patricia Highsmith’s Ripley Under Water (1991), Joyce Carol Oates’s Zombie (1995), and Lisa Moore’s Alligator (2006). Examining speculative fiction in chapter two, I unsettle the aligning of autism and psychopathy in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake (2003), Tricia Sullivan’s Maul (2003), and Elizabeth Moon’s Speed of Dark (2002). Analysing terror narratives in chapter three, I interrogate sexist stereotypes in portrayals of the ‘psychopathic woman’ in Lionel Shriver’s We Need to Talk About Kevin (2003), Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl (2012), and Maureen Medved’s Black Star (2018). Chapter four turns to witness narratives on sexual violence to examine Alice Sebold’s The Lovely Bones (2002), Myriam Gurba’s Mean (2017), and Katherena Vermette’s The Break (2016). Cumulatively, my readings expose and unsettle the stigmatising, pathologising, and demonising aspects of psychopathy discourses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".