MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889248012 · doi:10.25493/gcfg-2mw

Metadata Schema of the Common Data Elements for Dementia (v3)

2020· dataset· en· W6889248012 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEBRAINS · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataInformaticsSchema (genetic algorithms)DementiaHealth informaticsProxy (statistics)Data typeHierarchyThe InternetVariable (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data in the Medical Informatics Platform (MIP) resides in hospital servers and never leaves the hospital. Analyses and experiments are executed with respect to that principle while preserving patients’ anonymity making it infeasible for their identity to be inferred. Hospitals importing their data to the Medical Informatics Platform join a federation so as to run analyses on data from other hospital nodes as well. Each federation in the MIP refers to a specific Medical Condition. Here the metadata for the federation of hospitals that studies dementia is presented. This metadata schema, consisting of a total of 180 variables, has the following main variable categories: **1. PET** - 3 variables (AV45, FDG-PET, PIB SUVR) which are average scores of measurements collected by a Positron Emission Tomography **2. Brain Anatomy** - 135 volumetric variables based on a brain atlas. Values have been generated from the brain feature extraction pipeline which uses SPM12 **3. Diagnosis** - 12 polynomial variables related to medical conditions like Alzheimer and Parkinson **4. Neuropsychology** - 4 variables for scores in Mini Mental State Examination , 1 Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Hoehn and Yahr scale, Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale **5. Demographics** - 5 variables for basic demographic information that does not reveal patient’s identity **6. Genetic** - 14 variables for Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms which are for genetic variation **7. Proteome** - 6 variables which depict the level of some proteins The metadata viewing and management is done by Data Catalogue, a central web portal of MIP. Data Catalogue offers presentation, search and hierarchical visualisation of metadata information for datasets imported into the MIP while providing metadata management features to authorized users. One of its features is parsing metadata descriptions in XLSX files and generating their equivalent in a hierarchical JSON format which the MIP uses. In this repository we upload metadata in both XLSX and the generated JSON format.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBRAINSFrench-language works237,207