The Looking Glass : New Perspectives on Children's Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This journal considers all aspects of children's and young adult literature: critical analysis, authorship, illustration, publishing, as well as social and cultural influences. "<i>The Looking Glass: new perspectives in children's literature</i> (ISSN 1551-5680) ... was first published as a set of webpages in 1997, its parent organization was the Toronto Centre for the Study of Children's Literature (TCSCL), then housed at the Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto. From July 1998, it was independent of any institutional support and was published by volunteers in the United States. In 2007 La Trobe University in Australia began providing hosting and technical support, utilising the [now de-commissioned] OJS open access journal system." -- The description above was taken from "Open Access and Web 2.0 in the Academy: Changing and Exchanging Scholarship in Children's Literature" by David Beagley - see https://doi.org/10.26181/22200340 <b>Journal Issues:</b> The Looking Glass. Vol. 22 No. 1 (2019) The Looking Glass. Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018) The Looking Glass. Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017) The Looking Glass. Vol. 19 No. 1 (2016) The Looking Glass. Vol. 18 No. 2 (2015) The Looking Glass. Vol. 18 No. 1 (2015) The Looking Glass. Vol. 17 No. 3 (2014) The Looking Glass. Vol. 17 No. 2 (2014) The Looking Glass. Vol. 17 No. 1 (2013) The Looking Glass. Vol. 16 No. 2 (2012) The Looking Glass. Vol. 16 No. 1 (2012) The Looking Glass. Vol. 15 No. 3 (2011) The Looking Glass. Vol. 15 No. 2 (2011) The Looking Glass. Vol. 15 No. 1 (2011) The Looking Glass. Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010) The Looking Glass. Vol. 14 No. 1 (2010) The Looking Glass. Vol. 13 No. 3 (2009) The Looking Glass. Vol. 13 No. 2 (2009) The Looking Glass. Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009) The Looking Glass. Vol. 12 No. 2 (2008) The Looking Glass. Vol. 12 No. 1 (2008) The Looking Glass. Vol. 11 No. 3 (2007) The Looking Glass. Vol. 11 No. 2 (2007) The Looking Glass. Vol. 11 No. 1 (2007) The Looking Glass. Vol. 10 No. 3 (2006) The Looking Glass. Vol. 10 No. 2 (2006) The Looking Glass. Vol. 10 No. 1 (2006) The Looking Glass. Vol. 9 No. 3 (2005) The Looking Glass. Vol. 9 No. 2 (2005) The Looking Glass. Vol. 9 No. 1 (2005) The Looking Glass. Vol. 8 No. 3 (2004) The Looking Glass. Vol. 8 No. 2 (2004) The Looking Glass. Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004) The Looking Glass. Vol. 7 No. 3 (2003) The Looking Glass. Vol. 7 No. 2 (2003) The Looking Glass. Vol. 7 No. 1 (2003) The Looking Glass. Vol. 6 No. 1 (2002) The Looking Glass. Vol. 5 No. 1 (2001) The Looking Glass. Vol. 4 No. 3 (2000) The Looking Glass. Vol. 4 No. 2 (2000) The Looking Glass. Vol. 4 No. 1 (2000) The Looking Glass. Vol. 3 No. 3 (1999) The Looking Glass. Vol. 3 No. 2 (1999) The Looking Glass. Vol. 3 No. 1 (1999) The Looking Glass. Vol. 2 No. 3 (1998) The Looking Glass. Vol. 2 No. 2 (1998) The Looking Glass. Vol. 2 No. 1 (1998) The Looking Glass. Vol. 1 No. 4 (1997) The Looking Glass. Vol. 1 No. 3 (1997) The Looking Glass. Vol. 1 No. 2 (1997) The Looking Glass. Vol. 1 No. 1 (1997)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".