The Looking Glass : New Perspectives on Children's Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This journal considers all aspects of children's and young adult literature: critical analysis, authorship, illustration, publishing, as well as social and cultural influences. "The Looking Glass: new perspectives in children's literature (ISSN 1551-5680) ... was first published as a set of webpages in 1997, its parent organization was the Toronto Centre for the Study of Children's Literature (TCSCL), then housed at the Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto. From July 1998, it was independent of any institutional support and was published by volunteers in the United States. In 2007 La Trobe University in Australia began providing hosting and technical support, utilising the [now de-commissioned] OJS open access journal system." -- The description above was taken from "Open Access and Web 2.0 in the Academy: Changing and Exchanging Scholarship in Children's Literature" by David Beagley - see https://doi.org/10.26181/22200340 Journal Issues: The Looking Glass. Vol. 22 No. 1 (2019) The Looking Glass. Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018) The Looking Glass. Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017) The Looking Glass. Vol. 19 No. 1 (2016) The Looking Glass. Vol. 18 No. 2 (2015) The Looking Glass. Vol. 18 No. 1 (2015) The Looking Glass. Vol. 17 No. 3 (2014) The Looking Glass. Vol. 17 No. 2 (2014) The Looking Glass. Vol. 17 No. 1 (2013) The Looking Glass. Vol. 16 No. 2 (2012) The Looking Glass. Vol. 16 No. 1 (2012) The Looking Glass. Vol. 15 No. 3 (2011) The Looking Glass. Vol. 15 No. 2 (2011) The Looking Glass. Vol. 15 No. 1 (2011) The Looking Glass. Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010) The Looking Glass. Vol. 14 No. 1 (2010) The Looking Glass. Vol. 13 No. 3 (2009) The Looking Glass. Vol. 13 No. 2 (2009) The Looking Glass. Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009) The Looking Glass. Vol. 12 No. 2 (2008) The Looking Glass. Vol. 12 No. 1 (2008) The Looking Glass. Vol. 11 No. 3 (2007) The Looking Glass. Vol. 11 No. 2 (2007) The Looking Glass. Vol. 11 No. 1 (2007) The Looking Glass. Vol. 10 No. 3 (2006) The Looking Glass. Vol. 10 No. 2 (2006) The Looking Glass. Vol. 10 No. 1 (2006) The Looking Glass. Vol. 9 No. 3 (2005) The Looking Glass. Vol. 9 No. 2 (2005) The Looking Glass. Vol. 9 No. 1 (2005) The Looking Glass. Vol. 8 No. 3 (2004) The Looking Glass. Vol. 8 No. 2 (2004) The Looking Glass. Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004) The Looking Glass. Vol. 7 No. 3 (2003) The Looking Glass. Vol. 7 No. 2 (2003) The Looking Glass. Vol. 7 No. 1 (2003) The Looking Glass. Vol. 6 No. 1 (2002) The Looking Glass. Vol. 5 No. 1 (2001) The Looking Glass. Vol. 4 No. 3 (2000) The Looking Glass. Vol. 4 No. 2 (2000) The Looking Glass. Vol. 4 No. 1 (2000) The Looking Glass. Vol. 3 No. 3 (1999) The Looking Glass. Vol. 3 No. 2 (1999) The Looking Glass. Vol. 3 No. 1 (1999) The Looking Glass. Vol. 2 No. 3 (1998) The Looking Glass. Vol. 2 No. 2 (1998) The Looking Glass. Vol. 2 No. 1 (1998) The Looking Glass. Vol. 1 No. 4 (1997) The Looking Glass. Vol. 1 No. 3 (1997) The Looking Glass. Vol. 1 No. 2 (1997) The Looking Glass. Vol. 1 No. 1 (1997)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.087 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.034 | 0.050 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".