MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spasticity-Reducing Hand Surgery : Improved Function, Activity and Patientsu2019 Satisfaction At One-Year Follow-Up

2017· other· en· W6889742879 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Context (archaeology)ElectromyographyScale (ratio)Reliability (semiconductor)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spasticity-reducing hand surgery: improved function, activity and patientsu2019 satisfaction at one year follow-upUlla Bergfeldt RPT PhD, Joakim Stru00f6mberg MD PhD, Therese Ramstru00f6m OT, Katarzyna Kulbacka-Ortiz MSc, Carina Reinholdt MD PhD.Centre for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities (C.A.R.E.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SwedenBackground and aims We evaluated if spasticity-reducing surgery in the upper extremity could improve motor function, fulfill patientu2019s specific goals and influence performance of daily activities in patients with muscle over-activity. Methods Thirty consecutive patients with spasticity due to stroke and other CNS injuries were included. Before surgery the patientsu2019 clinical problems related to spasticity were defined and motor function and activity assessed. Each patientu2019s potential to comply with the post-surgical rehabilitation procedure was estimated and the intensity level chosen (low, moderate or high). Surgery mainly comprised lengthening of tendons and release of muscles. Physiotherapy, occupational therapy, wrapping and application of orthoses started the first post-operative day. Patients were taught a home-training program. One week of intensive in-hospital rehabilitation followed 2-3 weeks after surgery and a new home-training program was designed. General hand function (usefulness) and pain were evaluated using the VAS scale (0-10), spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (0-5) and activity by Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (performance and satisfaction mean values). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.Results At one year follow-up general hand function increased (2.1 vs. 4.2; p< 0.001), pain decreased (3.0 vs. 1.7; p< 0.05), and spasticity decreased (3.5 vs. 2.1; p<0.001). Both activity measures: performance and satisfaction improved (2.0 vs. 5.5; p<0.01 and 1.9 vs. 5.5; p<0.01). ConclusionHand surgery combined with comprehensive rehabilitation is a therapeutic option to reduce muscle over-activity, improve hand function, reduce pain, and promote patient ability for arm-hand activities and satisfaction in daily life in patients with disabling spasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0230.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.026
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)French-language works237,207