MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Importance of Lymphatic Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (Omt) in The Practice and Training of Osteopaths in Quu00E9Bec : a Qualitative Research Study

2017· other· en· W6889773627 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteopathyOsteopathic medicine in the United StatesManual therapyQualitative researchThematic analysisLymphatic system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The professionalization of osteopathy is imminent in Quebec and it is therefore important to define the major branches of osteopathy and to outline new fields of research. The lymphatic system is one of these important areas, but it has been little explored in practice, training, and research. Objective Explore the osteopathic conception of the lymphatic system in practice and in training, from the perspective of osteopaths practicing and teaching in Quebec. Methods Three teachers and four osteopaths were recruited using a convenience sampling. Data was collected through socio-demographic questionnaires; text books; pedagogical materials; school curriculum descriptions; audio-recorded interviews transcriptions; and a validation group interview using a constructivist design. Thematic analysis was used for individual interviews until saturation, and analysed data was submitted to all participants allowing for co-construction. Results The participants described the lymphatic system using the osteopathic principles of globalism, autoregulation, structure and function interrelations, and the importance of free fluid circulation. They defined the system as omnipresent and inseparable from osteopathic philosophy. The majority of participants admitted they do not treat lymphatics in their practice. Paradoxically, they also stated that every osteopathic technique can have a lymphatic impact. Osteopathic training on lymphatics is variable among programs and, most of the time, is nonexistent. All participants stated that the lymphatic system is as important as every other body system in osteopathy but acknowledged that it is overlooked. The participants pointed out the distinction between lymphatic OMT and other manual therapies. The distinctive aspects are the adaptation of the treatment method to the client using a specific evaluation; multiple techniques addressing the lymphatics directly; the osteopathu2019s palpation skill; and osteopathic philosophy. Conclusion There was consensus about the gap between the primary importance given to lymphatics in osteopathic philosophy and the little place designated to it in practice and training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.305
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)French-language works237,207