Η οσφυαλγία στους νοσηλευτές ψυχικής υγείας
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background:The etiology of occupational Low Back Pain is complex.Lifestyle, physical, psychosocial and occupational factors play an important role in increasing the risk of LBP among nurses, with its prevalence being high worldwide.Mental health nurses are exposed to many of these factors in their every day work due to their job specificity, becoming prone, in that way, to health problems.Aims and objectives: a) to investigate the prevalence of LBP among mental health nurses b) to study the factors associated with LBP c) to create a model that predicts LBP in the current setting. Study design:A cross-sectional study was conducted among mental health nurses, working in three psychiatric clinics, between November 2014 and May 2015. Materials and method:A self-report questionnaire was administered in order to measure personal characteristics, LBP (Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory), quality of life (SF-36) and job satisfaction (Measure of Job Satisfaction).Eligible subjects were all nurses working in psychiatric clinics in the region of Larissa, Greece.Exclusion criteria involved a surgery or systemic disease relative to back disorders or already diagnosed specific low back pain disorder.142 questionnaires were distributed and the response rate was 40.1% (n=57). Results:The prevalence of LBP was 80.7%.After adjusting for covariates, smoking was moderately, positively correlated with LBP; depressive symptoms were strongly, positively correlated to LBP; professional support, personal satisfaction and satisfaction with workload moderately, negatively correlated with LBP and all aspects of quality of life strongly, negatively, correlated with LBP (p<0.05).After applying multiple regression analysis the best predictors for LBP were depressive symptoms and smoking (R=62.5%).Conclusions: There was a high prevalence of LBP among mental health nurses.Many factors were identified that would necessitate multidisciplinary involvement to reduce the LBP incidence and related costs.Depression symptoms and smoking must be taken serious into account in prevention strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".