MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TBI and Intimate Partner Violence in Women Presenting to Orthopedic Fracture Clinic

2017· other· en· W6889857380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomestic violenceOrthopedic surgeryPoison controlInjury preventionOccupational safety and healthSuicide preventionOrthopedic traumaHuman factors and ergonomicsPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) are at substantial risk for traumatic brain injury (TBI), as the head, neck and face are the areas most often targeted during episodes of abuse. Victims of IPV may present to health care practitioners, including orthopedic surgeons, with IPV-related injuries, but they are not routinely screened for TBI. There is increased awareness of IPV among orthopedic surgeons in Canada, and training is now available about how to address IPV in the fracture clinic. Prevalence of TBI in this group, however, is unknown. TBI-related cognitive disorders may increase risk for poor outcomes from IPV, thus knowledge about TBI prevalence in this group is critical for clinical intervention. This study aimed to determine prevalence of IPV and TBI among women presenting to orthopedic fracture clinic. We interviewed 105 women presenting at an orthopedic fracture clinic. All participants completed the Ohio State University TBI identification method-interview (OSU-TBI), the direct method of IPV screening questionnaire, a modified version of the HELPS questionnaire, and the neurobehavioral symptom inventory (NSI). Study variables were 12-month and lifetime prevalence of IPV, prevalence of mild and moderate-severe TBI, and prevalence of comorbid IPV and TBI. Forty-six of 105 women (43.8%) who completed the OSU-TBI reported at least one head or neck injury resulting in a TBI. Of women reporting TBI, 11 (23.9%) met criteria for moderate-severe TBI. Forty-four of 104 women who completed the IPV screening questionnaire women (42.3%) disclosed a history of IPV-related abuse within their lifetime, with 25 (24%) of these women reporting physical abuse. Twenty of these women (19.2%) reported a history of IPV-related abuse within the past twelve months, with 7 (6.7%) women reporting physical abuse. Of 104 women who completed both the OSU-TBI and the IPV screening, 23 (22.1%) had comorbid TBI (mild, moderate or severe) and lifetime history of IPV. These preliminary results suggest that a large proportion of women attending an orthopedic fracture clinic have experienced IPV (42.3%), TBI (43.8%), or comorbid IPV and TBI (22.1%). These findings point to a need for development of regular IPV and TBI screening tools among women presenting to health clinics for physical injuries, as well as the need for further investigation of the consequences of TBI among IPV victims.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)French-language works237,207