MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889902213 · doi:10.26181/21856050

Outcomes of group exercise following hip or knee arthroplasty in an inpatient rehabilitation setting: a non-inferiority trial

2023· article· en· W6889902213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Trobe University · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationArthroplastyOsteoarthritisRandomized controlled trialKnee replacementRandomizationHip surgeryExercise therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Submission note: This thesis is submitted in total of the requirements for the Master of Applied Science (Research) to the School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.<br><br>Delivering exercise therapy in a group format is a common strategy in the management of post-operative hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation. However, it is not clear whether patients may expect outcomes from rehabilitation inclusive of group exercise that are similar to those of exercise that is delivered only on an individual basis. The aim of this thesis was to evaluate whether replacing one of two daily one-to-one exercise sessions with group exercise is not inferior to two one-to-one exercise sessions in inpatient rehabilitation setting for patients with hip or knee arthroplasty. Chapter two outlines a systematic review that investigates whether exercise therapy that is delivered to a group of patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis or arthroplasty provides similar outcomes as exercise that is delivered one-to-one. Evidence of the effectiveness of group exercise therapy is limited in these populations but suggests that outcomes are similar for each delivery mode. In the main study of this thesis, 88 participants were allocated by block randomization to receive either two daily sessions of one-to-one exercise (IndEx) or replacement of one of these sessions with group-based exercise (GpEx) on admission to an inpatient rehabilitation facility following hip or knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) was used to determine non-inferiority of the group exercise; secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength, Timed Up and Go, 10 Meter Walk Test, Six Minute Walk Test, cadence, velocity, stride length, hospital length of stay and patients’ satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed on admission, at discharge and at six months. Outcomes for GpEx participants were not inferior to IndEx on all outcomes. Replacing one of two daily one-to-one exercise sessions to group exercise does not lead to inferior clinical outcomes for patients at inpatient hospital discharge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Trobe UniversitySame topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesFrench-language works237,207