MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6891582725 · doi:10.48336/9tjw-gg65

Drift and deterioration of Petermann ice islands

2024· article· en· W6891582725 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceDrift iceArctic ice packAntarctic sea iceCurrent (fluid)IcebergLead (geology)Ice divide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eastern Canadian waters is an important part of Canadian shipping lanes and subjected to occasional ice island presence, which could pose serious hazards to offshore and shipping activities in this region. It is, therefore, important to better characterize the dynamics of glacial ice features for safe and cost-effective activities in the region. This thesis presents advanced predictive models to provide a better understanding of how atmospheric and oceanic variables influence ice island drift and deterioration. To understand how ice islands drift under the influence of atmospheric and oceanic forces, a deterministic model was presented, where the relative contribution of various forces governing the drift of four tracked ice islands was quantified. The results showed that in low sea ice concentrations and ice island speeds, ocean current and sea surface tilt forces dominated ice island force balance (63% on average). Wind, however, played a minor role (< 5%), and Coriolis and sea ice forces were significant only at higher ice island speeds and sea ice concentrations, respectively. Atmospheric and oceanic variables were further studied using a probabilistic Bayesian approach to investigate their relative influences on the fracture events and drift velocities of hundreds of Petermann ice islands tracked in the Canadian Ice Island Drift, Deterioration and Detection database. The presented models identified water temperature and ocean currents as the most important contributor to ice island fracture events and drift velocities, respectively. It was revealed that under severe conditions of wind, current, waves, and air/water temperatures, ice islands are more likely to fracture, with fracture probability reaching as high as 75% in extreme conditions. It was also revealed that under stronger currents, ice islands are most likely to drift at higher speeds and in close proximity to ocean current direction. Models were validated using the 5-fold cross-validation approach and errors up to 39% and 29% were reported in the fracture and drift probability estimations, respectively. The presented models have predictive capabilities for future drift and deterioration of Petermann ice islands. However, further training and testing of the developed models is necessary before they can be used as operational forecasting tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207