MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Clinical study of deep brain stimulation for non ⁃ motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease

2022· article· en· W6891595321 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexEpworth Sleepiness ScaleDeep brain stimulationAnxietyBeck Depression InventoryRating scaleDepression (economics)Montreal Cognitive AssessmentBeck Anxiety InventoryHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on non⁃motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods A total of 41 patients with PD who underwent DBS in Tianjin Huanhu Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021 were selected as subjects. The cognitive function was assessed by Mini⁃Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. Beck Depression Inventory Ⅱ (BDI⁃Ⅱ) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) assessed depression and anxiety, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) assessed sleep disorders and sleepiness, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Ⅲ (UPDRSⅢ) assessed motor symptoms. Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was used to assess postoperative dependence on anti⁃PD drugs. Results The BDI⁃Ⅱscore (P=0.000), HAMA total scores (P=0.000) and its somatic anxiety (P=0.000), mental anxiety (P=0.000), PSQI total scores (P=0.000) and its subjective sleep quality (P=0.000), time to fall asleep (P=0.000), sleep duration (P=0.000), sleep efficiency (P=0.000), sleep disorders (P=0.000), sleep drug use (P=0.015), daytime dysfunction (P=0.000), ESS score (P=0.000), UPDRSⅢ score (P=0.000) and LEDD (P=0.000) had statistically significant differences before and after surgery. The improvement rates of BDI⁃Ⅱ, HAMA, PSQI and ESS were 46.00%, 33.58%, 34.67% and 34.30%, 49.69%, 35.01%, 38.19% and 36.20%, 50.51%, 35.24%, 39.77% and 39.44% at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery respectively. The scores at different postoperative observation points were significantly different from those before surgery (P<0.01, for all). However, there were no significant differences in MMSE total scores and its score of orientation, memory, attention and computation, recall ability and language function, as well as MoCA total scores and its score of visual spatial and executive function, naming, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall and orientation before and after surgery (P>0.05, for all). Conclusions DBS can significantly improve the motor symptoms, mood and sleep disorder of non⁃motor symptoms (NMS) in PD patients, and reduce the dose of anti⁃PD drugs, but has no effect on cognitive function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.561
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicNeurological disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→