Carpal instability after partial trapeziectomy, total trapeziectomy and the resection of the distal scaphoid pole: a cadaveric study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-dissociative carpal instability (CIND) may lead to severe functional impairment. Destabilisation of the scapho-trapezial-trapezoidal (STT) ligament complex seems to result in a CIND. MATERIALS AND METHODS In one group with eight cadaver arms, distal scaphoid pole was resected with the adjacent ligaments. In the other eight cadavers, hemitrapeziectomy was performed followed by total trapeziectomy. CT scans were performed in different wrist positions, and the changed positions of the scaphoid, lunate and capitate were measured in comparison to non-operated wrists. RESULTS Mainly in clenched fist position, dissociation between proximal and distal row can be determined after total trapeziectomy and resection of distal scaphoid pole. Capitate rotates dorsally up to 24°, the scaphoid up to 17° and the lunate up to 7° compared to the non-operated wrists. Resection of the distal scaphoid pole results in dorsal rotation of capitate and scaphoid of about 14° and the lunate 8°. Relative scapholunate and capitolunate angle increased significantly after total trapeziectomy, especially in clenched fist position. After scaphoid pole resection, significant SL and CL angles changes could be seen in almost every wrist position. CONCLUSION Destabilisation of the STT ligament complex by total trapeziectomy or distal scaphoid pole resection results in dissociation of the proximal and distal carpal row without instability within the proximal or distal row, corresponding to a CIND. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".