MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6891829389 · doi:10.48448/wyh1-n018

Spherical Pseudo-Cylindrical Representation for Omnidirectional Image Super-resolution

2024· other· en· W6891829389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUnderline Science Inc. · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmnidirectional antennaDistortion (music)Representation (politics)PixelProjection (relational algebra)Image (mathematics)Sample (material)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Omnidirectional images have attracted significant attention in recent years due to the rapid development of virtual reality technologies. Equirectangular projection (ERP), a naive form to store and transfer omnidirectional images, however, is not easy to be handled by existing two-dimensional (2D) image super-resolution (SR) methods since its inhomogeneous distributed sampling density and distortion across latitude. In this paper, we make one of the first attempts to design a spherical pseudo-cylindrical representation, which not only can let pixels at different latitudes adaptively adopt the best distinct sampling density but also is model-agnostic to most off-the-shelf SR methods to improve their performances. Specifically, we first upsample each latitude of the input ERP image and design a computationally tractable optimization algorithm to adaptively obtain a (sub)-optimal sampling density for each latitude of the ERP image. Then, for the distortion of ERP, we propose a new viewport-based training loss based on the original 3D sphere format of the omnidirectional image since the original format does not contain distortion. Finally, a simple yet effective recursive progressive omnidirectional SR network is designed to demonstrate the feasibility of our idea. The experimental results on public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method as well as the consistently superior performance of our method over most state-of-the-art methods quantitatively and qualitatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnderline Science Inc.French-language works237,207