CT Chest Imaging Using Normalized Join-Count: Predicting Emphysema Progression in the CanCOLD Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Pre-existing emphysema is recognized as an indicator of future worsening in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when observed through CT imaging. However, it remains uncertain whether additional factors, such as the spatial compactness of CT emphysema, might also serve as predictors of disease progression. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between the compactness of CT emphysema voxels and emphysema progression. Materials and Methods: This secondary analysis uses data from the prospective Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study, examining CT images obtained in participants with and without COPD at baseline and a 3-year follow-up time point (November 2009 to November 2018). Measurements of forced expiratory volume in first second of expiration (FEV$_{1}$) and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) were collected. The normalized join-count (NJC) measurement from baseline CT images and lung density (LD) changes were analyzed. Emphysema progression was defined as an annualized LD change of less than half an SD below the mean of the participants without COPD with no smoking history. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between baseline CT NJC measurements and the annualized change in LD, FEV$_{1}$, DLco, and emphysema progression versus nonprogression. Results: A total of 524 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [SD]; 293 male) (FEV$_{1}$ percent predicted, 88% ± 19; FEV$_{1}$/FVC, 67% ± 9; DLco percent predicted, 105% ± 25) were analyzed, 187 (36%) of whom had COPD. CT NJC was associated with the annualized change in LD (P < .001), FEV$_{1}$ (P = .02), and DLco (P = .01). Additionally, CT NJC predicted emphysema progression versus nonprogression (odds ratio, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.37, 3.50; P < .001). Conclusion: The spatial distribution, or "compactness," of CT emphysema voxels predicted emphysema progression in individuals with and without COPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".