Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aphis pilicornis Hartig, 1841 Aphis pilicornis Hartig, 1841: 369. HOLOTYPE: (617 [7.02]), Picea. Cinaropsis pilicornis (Hartig, 1841) (change of combination—Börner, 1952: 43). Cinara pilicornis (Hartig, 1841) (change of combination— Hottes, 1953: 158). Valid Specimens. A single pinned alate (617) collected from spruce on June 24, 1833 in Tiergarten, Berlin, Germany. Remarks. Although its generic assignment has yet to be determined, specimen 617 does not belong to the genus Cinara as determined by the curved radial veins on its forewings and the process terminalis being greater in length than the base of antennal segment six. The specimen may instead represent a species of Periphyllus van der Hoeven, 1863 recorded from an accidental host. Given the discrepancy between the specimen’s identity and the name Cinara pilicornis Hartig, 1841, and that the name is well established in the literature, this case will be referred to the ICZN with the recommendation that it use its plenary power to set aside the existing name-bearing type in accordance with Article 75.6 so that the prevailing use of the name may be maintained and that a neotype be designated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it