Bibliographic record
Abstract
144. Gymnusa grandiceps Casey (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 1979, 2018, 2020, 2021), Table 1 References. Casey 1915. Klimaszewski 1979, 1982. Klimaszewski and Génier 1985. Webster et al. 2009. Majka and Klimaszewski 2010. Klimaszewski et al. 2011, 2018, 2020, 2021. Distribution. Nearctic, transcontinental in Canada, recorded from A/S (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). Canada: BC, LB, MB, NB, NF, NS, ON, QC. USA: IL, MA, MD, ME, MI, NH, NY, RI. Collection and Habitat data. In NH captured in alder litter, litter by stream, and Alnus litter and Sphagnum near pond. Collected in March and September in NH; collected in April–May in ME. In Canada found in wet forested biotypes such as black spruce bogs (usually in lag zone), alder swamps, spruce and eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis L.) forests and swamps, vernal pond margins, and margins of small brooks under alders; in moist leaf litter and mosses in these habitats (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). Material. USA, Maine, Waldo Co.: Camden Hills St. Pk., Mt. Battle, 29.V.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter along stream, 3 sex? York Co.: West Lebanon, 1–8.IV.1990, 1 sex?; 18–26.IV.1990, 2 sex?; 7–14.V.1990, 2 sex?; 7–13.V.1990, D.W. Barry, FIT, 1 sex? Maryland, Calvert Co.: 1 mi S Chesapeake Beach, 12.VI.1983, D.S. Chandler, sift beach litter along marsh, 1 sex? Massachusetts, Middlesex Co.: Sherborn, 21–25.III, C.A. Frost, sifting, 1 sex? New Hampshire, Coos Co.: Norton Pool, 2 mi E East Inlet Dam, 7.IX.1984, D.S. Chandler, sift alder litter, 1 sex? 17 km S Gorham, Glen Ellis Falls, 1900’, 8.IX.1987, J.M. Campbell and A. Davies, sifting litter by stream (CNC), 1 sex? 8 mi S Gorham, Pinkham Notch, J.M. Campbell and A. Davies, sifting Alnus litter and Sphagnum near pond (CNC) 1 sex? Rockingham Co.: Hampton, 27.III.1932, S.A. Shaw, 1 sex?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".