Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oecobius navus Blackwall, 1859 (Figures 1E, F, 4A–D) Oecobius annulipes: Baum 1972: 117, figs 17–19, 50–53, 62 (♂ ♀). Oecobius navus: Wunderlich 1995: 595, figs 31–35 (♂ ♀). For the full list of 69 taxonomic entries see WSC (2023). Material IRAN: Mazandaran Province: 1♂ (ZMMU), Nashtarud, 36.733333°N, 51.066667°E, 9‒10 June 2000 (Y.M. Marusik); 2♀ (ZMMU), Ramsar, 36.916667°N, 50.666667°E, 10 June 2000 (Y.M. Marusik). Comments This species differs from the congeners occurring in the region by the dark lateral patches on clypeus, three pairs of sublateral dots on carapace (indistinct in some specimens), and the presence of dots on legs (but not annulations). We noted that it has a kind of retrolateral tibial apophysis (arrowed in Figure 4A), which has not been previously documented. Distribution West Palaearctic. Introduced in South Africa, China, Korea, Japan, New Zealand, Canada, USA, South America (WSC 2023). New record for Iran (Figure 9).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.044 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".