Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Endopodalius Christian and Karg, 2006 Subgenus Lasioseius (Endopodalius) Christian and Karg, 2006 Type species: Lasioseius (Zygoseius) alter Vitzthum, 1925, original designation. Diagnosis — Adults of Endopodalius share with other genera included in the superfamily Ascoidea the series of attributes given above for diagnosis of that superfamily. As the only genus of Endopodaliidae, they are distinguished from those of other taxa of Ascoidea by the following characteristics, some of which are apomorphic, as indicated below: Dorsal shield with (1) humeral setae r3 not erect or differentiated in form from adjacent setae, and with (2) nearly all setae simple, none tricarinate, but (3) usually with setae Z4 and/or Z5 brushy, penicillate distally (apomorphy); (4) adult sternal shield anterior margin with more heavily sclerotized strip continuing as broadly widened extensions to unite with endopodal-peritrematal shield on either side (apomorphy); (5) female sternal shield posterior margin strongly convex, such that its posteromedian margin reaches same transverse level as adjacent, free metasternal plates (autapomorphy); (6) female endopodal plates between legs III-IV enlarged, extending under metasternal platelets (autapomorphy); (7) adult presternal region with small unpaired platelet at base of tritosternum (autapomorphy), and (8) with one to several paired platelets; (9) movable cheliceral digit with usually five or more teeth (apomorphy); (10) gnathotectum with elongated median process, fringed apically (apomorphy); (11) male with holoventral shield. Attributes 1, 2, 5-7 and 9-11 are repeated from the family diagnosis as distinctions from genera in closely related families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".