MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6892593020 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10980159

Dinomischidae Conway Morris 1977

2023· article· en· W6892593020 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalyxTentacle (botany)BractGenusDigestive tract

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Family Dinomischidae Conway Morris, 1977 Amended diagnosis (amended after Conway Morris, 1977, p. 834). Polypoid, sessile organism bearing a calyx encircled by tentacle-sheath complexes, with an organic skeleton. The basal portion of the calyx varies from a circular pit to a slender stalk. The tentacle carries sets of pinnules, each with a row of cilia, and preserves a set of paired dark stains. The outer sheath flanking each tentacle present. Remarks. Only one genus, Dinomischus, was assigned to the family Dinomischidae in previous studies (Chen et al., 1989; Conway Morris 1977; Peng et al., 2006), and although the genus Siphusauctum was considered closely related to Dinomischus, a separate family, Siphusauctidae, was erected for it (O'Brien & Caron, 2012). Dinomischus has long been interpreted as an entoproct comprising a calyx and sclerotized bracts (Chen et al., 1989; Conway Morris, 1977). A recent study revealed a potential blind digestive tract and a partitioned cavity in some well-preserved Dinomischus specimens, indicating that it is less likely to be a bilaterian entoproct which possesses a typical U-shaped gut (Zhao et al., 2019). Paired dark stains and pinnules identified recently in the bract of Dinomischus are similar to that of Daihua, and the body plan of Dinomischus has thus been revised as comprising a calyx and pinnate, sclerotized tentacles (Zhao et al., 2019). The present study further reveals that similar dark stains, as well as ciliated pinnules, appear in the longsword-shaped tentacles of Xianguangia. The tentacle in Siphusauctum also bears paired sets of dark stains, but lacks pinnules and is non-sclerotized. The outer sheath surrounding each tentacle has been identified in Xianguangia, Daihua, Dinomischus and Siphusauctum as well, but it likely varies in number. It is reasonable to formally assign the genera Xianguangia and Daihua, together with Dinomischus, to the family Dinomischidae, a monophyletic group recovered in our Bayesian phylogenetic analyses. The 18 pinnate, sclerotized tentacles, plus a calyx with an organic skeleton, could be recognized as synapomorphies for this family. Although our phylogenetic results support the previous hypothesis that dinomischiids are a total-group ctenophore (Klug et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2019), alternative phylogenetic analyses with different scores on the characters ‘cushion rows’ and ‘large cilia’ recover dinomischiids as either a stem-group ctenophore or in a polytomy with ctenophores and cnidarians. The phylum-level affinity of dinomischiids is indeterminate, and new fossil taxa with anatomical transformations would provide critical information to verify its position in the tree of life. Genera included. Dinomischus Conway Morris, 1977; Xianguangia Chen & Erdtmann, 1991; Daihua Zhao et al., 2019. Occurrence. Cambrian unnamed Series 2, Stage 3, Chengjiang biota, South China (Xianguangia, Daihua, Dinomischus); Miaolingian Series, Wuliuan Stage, Burgess Shale, Canada, and Kaili biota, South China (Dinomischus); Miaolingian Series, Barrandian area, Czech Republic (cp. Dinomischus).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIchthyology and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→