Copelatus bimaculatus Resende & Vanin 1991
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copelatus bimaculatus Resende & Vanin, 1991 (Figs 1A–B, 2A–B) Aglymbus bimaculatus Resende & Vanin, 1991: 124 (Brazil: São Paulo Province: Salesópolis: Guaratuba). Copelatus bimaculatus: Balke et al. 2008: 6357. Material examined: Brazil: 1♂ 1♀, Nova Friburga, Macaé de Cima, 1200 m, viii.1997, (LHCM); 2♀♀, Florianopolis, Santo Amaro da Imperatriz, 300 m, x.2004 (ZSMG). 7♂♂ 5♀♀, same locality, but: in Nidularium innocentii, 15.ii.2005, Zillikens leg. (NMPC, ZSMG). Diagnosis: Habitus drop-shaped, more strongly attenuated posteriorly than anteriorly, broadest at 1/3 of elytral length, slightly convex. Body black, clypeus, margins of pronotum and scutellar shield somewhat reddish translucent, appendages testaceous; elytra completely black in specimens from Nova Friburgo (Fig. 1B), but with small oval basal orange spot between striae 4–8 in specimens from St. Amaro (Fig. 1A). Dorsal surface submatt due to well impressed reticulation and presence of fine longitudinal striolae. Head moderately broad, c. 0.57 × width of pronotum, trapezoidal. Antennae with antennomeres rather broad, thus of stouter appearance. Pronotum transverse, broadest at posterior angles; sides strongly and evenly curved, lateral beading distinct except for anterior corners. Elytral striation consisting of 11 superficially impressed discal + a submarginal stria: odd striae, especially striae 5, 7, 9 often incomplete and badly perceptible due to striolation, in some specimens almost absent. Protibia modified, slightly angled near base, distinctly broadened anteriorly, club shaped. Pro- and mesotarsomeres 1–3 distinctly broadened, ventrally with adhesive setae. Natatorial setae present only on dorsal side of metatarsomeres. Median lobe of aedeagus in lateral aspect ʻCʼ- shaped, apex obtusely pointed; in ventral aspect median lobe evenly attenuating to straight, pointed apex (Fig. 2A–B). Parameres broad, ʻDʼ -shaped. Female somewhat smaller than male: TL ♂♂: 6.1–6.4 mm; TL ♀♀: 5.9–6.3 mm. Distribution: The species is distributed in the Atlantic forests, along the coast from Rio de Janeiro to Santa Catarina provinces, south-eastern Brazil (Fig. 3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".