MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892640882 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10538652

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) weemsi

2010· article· en· W6892640882 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumHead (geology)Apex (geometry)KeelSterna

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) weemsi (Mitchell) (Figure 238A–C) Dialictus weemsi Mitchell, 1960: 431. ♀. Holotype. ♀ USA, North Carolina, Wake Co., 16.vi.1955 on Melilotus officinalis (H.V. Weems, Jr.); [FSCA]. Examined. Taxonomy. Krombein, 1967: Lasioglossum (Dialictus) weemsi, p. 467 (catalogue); Dialictus weemsi, p. 1973 (catalogue); Moure & Hurd, 1987: Dialictus weemsi, p. 140 (catalogue). Diagnosis. Females of L. weemsi can be recognised by the shape of the clypeus which has subparallel apicolateral margins, acute apicolateral angles and a broad, straight distal margin. They may be further distinguished by the round head (length/width ratio = 0.90–0.94), tessellate mesoscutum with moderately dense punctures on the central disc (i=1–1.5d), rugulose mesepisternum, pale tegula, and T1 acarinarial fan with dorsal opening. They differ from L. mitchelli which lacks a dorsal opening on the T1 acarinarial fan. Lasioglossum weemsi is similar to some members of the L. viridatum species-group such as L. admirandum and L. paradmirandum. Females of the L. viridatum species-group have the clypeus distinctly convergent towards the apex and a distinct dorsal opening of the acarinarial fan. Male unknown. Redescription. FEMALE. Length 4.24–4.90 mm; head length 1.27–1.49 mm; head width 1.32–1.58 mm; forewing length 3.21–3.81 mm. Colouration. Head and mesosoma green with faint bluish reflections to mostly blue. Clypeus with apical half blackish brown. Antenna dark brown, flagellum with ventral surface ruddy. Mesoscutum sometimes with brassy reflections. Tegula amber to reddish. Wing membrane subhyaline, venation and pterostigma brownish yellow. Legs brown, tarsi reddish brown to amber. Metasoma dark brown, terga and sterna with apical margins translucent brownish yellow. Pubescence. Dull white. Moderately sparse. Head and mesosoma with moderately sparse woolly hairs (1– 2 OD), longest on genal beard, metanotum and mesopleuron (2–2.5 OD). Paraocular area with moderately sparse tomentum, partially obscuring surface. Gena with sparse tomentum. Propodeum with moderately dense plumose hairs on lateral and posterior surfaces (2–2.5 OD). Metasomal terga with moderately sparse, fine setae. T1 acarinarial fan with distinct dorsal opening. T2–T3 basolaterally and T4 entirely with sparse tomentum. T2 apicolateral and T3–T4 apical margins with sparse fringes. Surface sculpture. Face imbricate, punctation fine. Clypeus with apical half polished, punctation sparse (i=1–3d). Supraclypeal area with punctation moderately sparse (i=1–2.5d). Lower paraocular area punctation dense (i≤d). Antennocular area punctation moderately dense (i=1–1.5d). Upper paraocular area and frons punctate-reticulate. Ocellocular area obscurely punctate (i=d). Gena lineolate. Postgena imbricate. Mesoscutum tessellate, punctation moderately dense between parapsidal lines (i=1–1.5d), dense laterad of parapsidal lines (i≤d), contiguous on anterolateral portion. Mesoscutellum similar to mesoscutum, submedial punctation sparse (i=2–5d). Axilla minutely punctate. Metanotum imbricate. Preëpisternum rugose. Hypoepimeral area strongly imbricate-lineolate. Mesepisternum dorsal half rugulose, ventral half ruguloso-imbricate. Metepisternum with dorsal two-fifths striate, ventral portion imbricate. Metapostnotum incompletely striate, posterior margin imbricate. Propodeum with dorsolateral slope rugulose, lateral surface tessellate-imbricate, posterior surface tessellate. Metasomal terga faintly coriarious, punctation uniformly spaced on disc (i=1–1.5d) except apical impressed area nearly impunctate. Structure. Head very wide (length/width ratio = 0.93–0.96). Eyes convergent below (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.23–1.29). Clypeus ½ below suborbital tangent, apicolateral angle subparallel. Antennal sockets close (IAD/ OAD <0.5). Frontal line carinate, ending 2 OD below median ocellus. Gena narrower than eye. Inner metatibial spur pectinate with 3–4 teeth. Metapostnotum truncate (MMR ratio = 1.23–1.29), posterior margin weakly angled onto posterior surface. Propodeum with oblique carina absent, lateral carina not reaching dorsal margin. MALE. Unknown. Range. Southern Ontario south to South Carolina (Fig. 239). Additional materal examined. CANADA: ONTARIO: 1♀ Norfolk Co., Pterophylla Plant Nursery, N42°38.404´W080°34.379´, 13–22.viii.2006 (P.J. Carson); 1♀ York University Keele Campus, nr CSEB, 6.vi.2006 (E. Willis); 1♀ York University Keele Campus, nr Pond Rd. residences, 28.vii.2005 (E. Willis); [PCYU]; USA: ILLINOIS: 1♀ E of Carlinville, N39.2596 W089.5485, 25.vi.2006 (J. Gibbs); 1♀ Macoupin Co., E of Carlinville, N39.27869 W089.7961, 25.vi.2006 (C. Sheffield); MARYLAND: 2♀ Pr. George’s Co., N39.0352 W076.8739, 21.vii.2004 (S. Kolski); NEW YORK: 1♀ Hwy 63, N of Genesio, N42.8235 W077.7425, 11.vi.2006 (J. Gibbs); [PCYU]; NORTH CAROLINA: 1♀ Blue Ridge Pkwy, nr Jefferson, N36.34234 W081.37465, 13.viii.2006 (J. Gibbs); PENNSYLVANIA: 1♀ Philadelphia Co., N39.9628 W075.1773, 23.viii.2005 (S.W. Droege); SOUTH CAROLINA: 2♀ Okanee Co., nr Walhalla, N34.80472 W083.14587, 9.viii.2006 (J. Gibbs); TENNESSEE: 1♀ Hwy 321, nr Gatlinburg, N35.7599 W083.3615, 8.viii.2006 (J. Gibbs); VIRGINIA: 1♀ Hwy 21, 8 km S of Elk, N36.68854 W081.17776, 14.viii.2006 (J. Gibbs); WEST VIRGINIA: 1♀ nr Charleston, N38.41211 W081.64776, 13.viii.2006 (J. Gibbs); [PCYU]; WISCONSIN: 1♀ Kewaunee Co., They’s Ag, N44.53102 W87.70013, 23.v.2006 (J. Watson); [ARC]. Comments. Common. Lasioglossum weemsi is very similar to L. mitchelli, apparently only differing in the T1 acarinarial fan and the DNA barcodes. Additional study is needed to test if these two warrant being recognised as distinct. A third species, L. leviense (Mitchell), known from the Southeastern United States, is also part of this complex. If one day these three are considered to be synonymous then L. leviense has page priority over L. weemsi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207