Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modifications for Identification Keys for Andinopanurgus Insertion of the following couplets at the beginning of Gonzalez et al.’s (2019) key for Andinopanurgus males will enable the newly described species to be identified: A. S4 with highly modified branched setae, some of which are rake or trident-like (Figs. 4–5, 13–14) ........................................................................................................ B —. S4 without highly modified setae, S5 sometimes with unusually structured setae ............................................... couplet 1 (page 215) of Gonzalez et al. (2019) B(A). Clypeus black, lacking apical transverse cream-colored band; S4 setae with from two to four branches (Figs. 4–5) [Argentina] ........... A. chirosimpson, n. sp. —. Clypeus with apical transverse cream-colored band; S4 setae with from two to five branches (Figs. 11–12) [Peru] ............................................. A. lynnae, n. sp. Insertion of the following couplet at the beginning of Gonzalez et al.’s (2019) key for Andinopanurgus females will enable identification of the female of A. amyae: A. Hypostomal carina strongly sinuate, concave anteriorly, strongly convex posteriorly (Fig. 18) ........................................................... A. amyae (Gonzalez & Engel) —. Hypostomal carina linear (Fig. 23) ............ couplet 1 of Gonzalez et al. (2019: 216). For identification of the female of A. lynnae, the following modifications are required to Gonzalez et al.’s (2019) key: 4. Metatibial scopal hairs whitish (Fig. 13) .............................................................. 4A —. Metatibial scopal hairs brown-black (Fig. 16) ........................................................... ....................................................................... couplet 5 in Gonzalez et al. (2019: 216) 4A. Metasomal terga with apical impressed areas translucent, area immediately anterior to apical impressed areas somewhat orange clearly differing from dark brown of discs of terga (Gonzalez et al., 2019: figs. 1b-d); facial fovea ≈3.7× longer than wide; mesotibial spur ≈0.8× length of mesobasitarsus .............................. ........................................................................... A. vargasllosai Gonzalez & Alvarado —. Metasomal terga with apical impressed areas red-brown, areas immediately anterior to apical impressed areas almost concolorous to discs of terga (Fig. 13); facial fovea ≈5× longer than maximum width; mesotibial spur ≈0.95× as long as mesobasitarsus (Fig. 15) .................................................................... A. lynnae, n. sp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".