Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data on arthropod trophic guilds & feeding structures compiled from the following sources: Aanen, D.K. and Eggleton, P., 2005. Fungus-growing termites originated in African rain forest. Current biology, 15(9), pp.851-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.043 Aanen, D.K., Eggleton, P., Rouland-Lefevre, C., Guldberg-Frøslev, T., Rosendahl, S. and Boomsma, J.J., 2002. The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(23), pp.14887-14892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.222313099 Adams, E.C.G., Salmon, J.T., 1972. The mouth-parts and feeding methods of Brachystomella parvula (Schaeffer) (Collembola: Brachystomellidae). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 124, 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1972.tb00366.x Bartlett, C.R., Deitz, L.L., Dmitriev, D.A., Sanborn, A.F., Soulier‐Perkins, A. and Wallace, M.S., (2018). The Diversity of the True Hoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.501-590. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch19 Bicha, W.J., (2018). Biodiversity of Mecoptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.705-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch23 Blanke, A. (2019). The Early Evolution of Biting–Chewing Performance in Hexapoda. In: Krenn, H. (eds) Insect Mouthparts. Zoological Monographs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_6 Borkent, A. 2008. The frog-biting midges of the world (Corethrellidae: Diptera). Zootaxa 1804: 1–456. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1804.1.1 Borkent, A. 2009. Chaoboridae (Phantom Midges). Pages 365-367 in Brown, B. V.; A. Borkent; J. M. Cumming; D. M. Wood; N. E. Woodley & M. A. Zumbado, eds., Manual of Central America Diptera. Volume 1. NRC Research Press, Ottawa. Bouchard, P., Smith, A.B., Douglas, H., Gimmel, M.L., Brunke, A.J. and Kanda, K., (2017). Biodiversity of Coleoptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.337-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch11 Bradler, S., T. R. Buckley. (2018). Biodiversity of Phasmatodea. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.281-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch11 Brandão, C.R.F., Feitosa, R.M. and Diniz, J.L., 2015. Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical Myrmicinae ant genus Blepharidatta Wheeler. Zootaxa, 4012(1), pp.33-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4012.1.2 Branstetter, M.G., Ješovnik, A., Sosa-Calvo, J., Lloyd, M.W., Faircloth, B.C., Brady, S.G. and Schultz, T.R., 2017. Dry habitats were crucibles of domestication in the evolution of agriculture in ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1852), p.20170095. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0095 Carmean, D. (1991) Biology of the Trigonalyidae (Hymenoptera), with notes on the vespine parasitoid Bareogonalos canadensis. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 18, 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1991.10757968 Cavalleri, A. and Kaminski, L.A., 2014. Two new ectoparasitic species of Aulacothrips Hood, 1952 (Thysanoptera: Heterothripidae) associated with ant-tended treehoppers (Hemiptera). Systematic Parasitology, 89, pp.271-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-014-9526-z Cavalleri, A., Kaminski, L.A. and Mendonça Jr, M.D.S., 2010. Ectoparasitism in Aulacothrips (Thysanoptera: Heterothripidae) revisited: host diversity on honeydew-producing Hemiptera and description of a new species. Zoologischer Anzeiger-A Journal of Comparative Zoology, 249(3-4), pp.209-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2010.09.002 Cavalleri, A., Kaminski, L.A. and Mendonca Jr, M.S., 2012. A new ectoparasitic Aulacothrips (Thysanoptera: Heterothripidae) from Amazon rainforest and the significance of variation in antennal sensoria. Zootaxa, 3438(1), pp.62-68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3438.1.4 Chapin, K.J. and Hebets, E.A., 2016. The behavioral ecology of amblypygids. Journal of Arachnology, pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1636/V15-62.1 Chen, H., Lahey, Z., Talamas, E.J., Valerio, A.A., Popovici, O.A., Musetti, L., Klompen, H., Polaszek, A., Masner, L., Austin, A.D. and Johnson, N.F., 2021. An integrated phylogenetic reassessment of the parasitoid superfamily Platygastroidea (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupomorpha) results in a revised familial classification. Systematic Entomology, 46(4), pp.1088-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12511 Chouvenc, T., Šobotník, J., Engel, M.S., Bourguignon, T., 2021. Termite evolution: mutualistic associations, key innovations, and the rise of Termitidae. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 2749–2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03728-z Coddington, J. A., Colwell, R.K. 2001. Arachnids Pages 199-218 in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Volume 1. Academic Press. San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00016-X Colombo, W.D., Tribull, C.M., Waichert, C. and Azevedo, C.O., 2022. Integrative taxonomy solves taxonomic impasses: a case study from Epyrinae (Hymenoptera, Bethylidae). Systematic Entomology, 47(3), pp.504-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12544 Courtney, G.W., Pape, T., Skevington, J.H. and Sinclair, B.J. (2017). Biodiversity of Diptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 229-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch9 David J. Lohman & Venancio U. Samarita (2009) The biology of carnivorous butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Miletinae: Miletini) and their ant‐tended hemipteran prey in Thailand and the Philippines, Journal of Natural History, 43:9-10, 569-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930802610485 De Clercq, P. (2008). Predatory Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Asopinae). Pages 3042-3045 in: Capinera, J.L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_3115 Devetak, D., Kloko, V., 2016. The feeding biology of adult lacewings (Neuroptera): a review. Trends in Entomology 12, 29–42. Donald, C.L., Siriyasatien, P. and Kohl, A., 2020. Toxorhynchites species: a review of current knowledge. Insects, 11(11), p.747. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110747 Donovan, S.E., Eggleton, P., Bignell, D.E., 2001. Gut content analysis and a new feeding group classification of termites. Ecological Entomology 26, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2001.00342.x Eberhard, M.J., Schoville, S.D. and Klass, K.D. (2018). Biodiversity of Grylloblattodea and Mantophasmatodea. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.335-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch13 Ferrar P. 1987. A guide to the breeding habits and immature stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Entomonograph. 8:1–907. Fialho, V.S., Chamorro-Rengifo, J., Lopes-Andrade, C. and Yotoko, K.S.C., 2014. Systematics of spiny predatory katydids (Tettigoniidae: Listroscelidinae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest based on morphology and molecular data. PloS one, 9(8), p.e103758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103758 Foelix, R., 2011. Biology of Spiders. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, New York. Foote, B.A., 1995. Biology of Shore Flies. Annual Review of Entomology 40, 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.002221 Fowles, T.M., Coscarón, M.d.C., Panizzi, A.R., Carroll, S.P. (2015). Scentless Plant Bugs (Rhopalidae). In: Panizzi, A., Grazia, J. (eds) True Bugs (Heteroptera) of the Neotropics. Entomology in Focus, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_20 Galli, L., Capurro, M., Colasanto, E., Molyneux, T., Murray, A., Torti, C., Zinni, M., 2020. A synopsis of the ecology of Protura (Arthropoda: Hexapoda). Revue suisse de Zoologie 126, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.346344 Garnier-Sillam, E., Toutain, F., Villemin, G. and Renoux, J., 1989. Preliminary studies of the particular combs of the xylophageous termite Sphaerotermes sphaerothorax (Sjöstedt). Insectes Sociaux, 36, pp.293-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224882 Gimmel, M.L., Ferro, M.L. (2018). General Overview of Saproxylic Coleoptera. In: Ulyshen, M. (eds) Saproxylic Insects. Zoological Monographs, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75937-1_2 Grimaldi, D. & Engel, M.S. 2005. Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press. https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q118956339 GRONENBERG, W., BRANDÃO, C.R.F., DIETZ, B.H. and JUST, S., 1998. Trap‐jaws revisited: the mandible mechanism of the ant Acanthognathus. Physiological Entomology, 23(3), pp.227-240. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.1998.233081.x Hancock, R.G., Boyd, T., MacFadden, S., Sowders, A., Foster, W.A., Lounibos, L.P., 2022. Mosquitoes Eating Mosquitoes: How Toxorhynchites amboinensis, Psorophora ciliata, and Sabethes cyaneus (Diptera: Culicidae) Capture Prey. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 115, 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saac017 Harrington, B.J., 1988. Comments on the blood-feeding tribe Cleradini (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae: Rhyparochrominae) and description of a new genus and new species with the legs modified for grasping. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 81(4), pp.577-580. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/81.4.577 Harvey, M.S., 2002. The neglected cousins: what do we know about the smaller arachnid orders? The Journal of arachnology, 30(2), pp.357-372. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3706280 Henry, T.J. (2017). Biodiversity of Heteroptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 279–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch10 Hogan, J., Bass, A.I., Zhang, Y.M. and Sharanowski, B.J., 2019. Integrating multiple sources of biodiversity information greatly expands the range of a rare species of Hymenopter
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.160 | 0.088 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".