MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893029039 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12720193

Zaphotias pedaliotus

2022· article· en· W6893029039 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchipelagoSAINTIndian oceanSea level

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zaphotias pedaliotus (Goode & Bean, 1896) (Fig. 4F) Diagnosis. As for the genus. Geographical distribution. Atlantic and Indian oceans, from 43ºN to 40ºS (Grey, 1964; Mukhacheva, 1976; Schaefer et al., 1986a; Quéro et al., 1990a; Porteiro et al., 1999; Hutchins, 2001; Olivar et al., 2017; Judkins, Haedrich, 2018; Bernal et al., 2020; Sutton et al., 2020). In the western Atlantic, the species was recorded from off Canada to northeastern Brazil, including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea (Grey, 1964; McAllister, 1990; McEachran, Fechhelm, 1998; Harold, 2003; Judkins, Haedrich, 2018). In Brazilian waters, the species was previously recorded off Maranhão State, the Rocas Atoll, and the Saint Peter and Saint Paul and Fernando de Noronha archipelagos (Mukhacheva, 1976; Eduardo et al., 2018a; Judkins, Haedrich, 2018). Zaphotias pedaliotus is herein recorded from off Rio Grande do Norte State (near the seamounts), Paraíba State, Rocas Atoll, and Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, based on specimens collected between depths of 130 and 984 m (Fig. 3C). Remarks. Until recently, this species was usually recognized as Bonapartia pedaliota Goode & Bean, 1896, including in Brazilian waters (e.g., Eduardo et al., 2018a; Judkins, Haedrich, 2018; Melo et al., 2020). However, Bonapartia Goode & Bean, 1896 is a junior homonym of Bonapartia Büttikofer, 1896 (Aves: Pycnonotidae). The species should therefore be recognized in Zaphotias Goode & Bean, 1898 (Sangster, 2021). Specimens examined. 141 (37–81 mm SL): NPM 4229, 47 (37–72 mm), AB2#52B; NPM 4392, 28 (42–71 mm), AB2#41A; NPM 4407, 3 (53–62 mm), AB2#56B; NPM 4408, 23 (40–81 mm), AB2#42A; NPM 4409, 6 (58–61 mm), AB2#52A; NPM 4423, 29 (49–71 mm), AB2#40A; NPM 4529, 1 (56 mm), AB2#21; NPM 4611, 1 (damaged), AB2#59A; NPM 5059, 2 (57–60 mm), AB2#44A; NPM 6106, 1 (damaged), AB2#44B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→