MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893041586 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13872623

Stability Indicating HPLC Method Development for a Marketed Retinol Acetate

2022· article· en· W6893041586 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigh-performance liquid chromatographyRetinolElutionEthyl acetateSolventAcetonitrileMethanolReversed-phase chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rapid, sensitive, and accurate stability indicating high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of retinol acetate from the marketed sample was developed. Retinol acetate is a vitamin A acetate, useful in normal eye vision, also acts as a supportive anticancer, which works by binding to glycocalyx of colon slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells. The chromatographic separation was performed on a HPLC system consisted of Plus intelligent LC pump® PU-2080 from Agilent, Germany equipped with a Agilent®UV-2075 Intelligent UV-Visible detector, an injector Rheodyne®7725 (Rheodyne, Cotati, CA, USA), along with Agilent chromapass chromatography data system software (Version 1.8.6.1). Column Purospher Star 5μm Agilent® RP C18 XDB (4.6 mm × 150 mm) using a sonicated, degassed mobile phase containing solvent A: acetonitrile and solvent B: methanol in ratio (89:11v/v) having pH 3.5 with a flow rate of1 mL/min. The elution was detected by a uv-visible detector at 360 nm. The total chromatographic runtime is 20.0 min with a retention time for sample BASF stabilized sample and standard Sigma Aldrirch internal standard was of 8.05 and 8.2 min, respectively. The method was validated over a dynamic linear range of 10-50µg/mL for retinol acetate with a correlation coefficient (r2) 0.999. The forced degradation study also revealed the susceptibility (sensitivity) of a drug towards heat, acid, base, hydrogen peroxide, light and photolytic degradation. This indicated photosensitivity and temperature sensitivity of the drug substance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207