Comatricha afroalpina Rammeloo, Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comatricha afroalpina Rammeloo, Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg. 53(1/2):297 (1983). Figure 4. Scattered sporocarps are 1–2 mm in total height. The red-brown stalk is 0.5–1 mm tall. The sporothecae are spherical and dark brown. A tapered columella reaches almost to the apex in the smaller sporocarps. An abundant capillitium peripherally s an incomplete irregular network with numerous free ends. Grey-brown spores are regularly verruculose with dispersed groups of larger dark warts, which sometimes form an incomplete reticulum; the spores are 8–10 μm in diameter. Specimen examined: CHINA. Jiangxi Province, East China Institute of Technology, 17 June 2013, Zhang2016011102 (HMJAU-M1006). Discussion: The genus Comatricha Preuss has been reported to contain 41 species, but only two species, C. vineatilis and C. alpina, are similar to C. macrospora. Like C. macrospora, C. aplina has a persistent peridium at the base of the sporotheca; meanwhile C. vineatilis is similar to C. afroalpina in having regularly verruculose spores dispersed in larger groups. Comatricha vineatilis (spore size: 6–7 μm in diameter) has smaller spores than C. afroalpina (spore size: 8–10 μm in diameter), whereas C. alpina (spore size: 11–12 μm in diameter) is a nivicolous species and has larger spores than C. afroalpina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".