Bibliographic record
Abstract
LYMAENON Walker, 1846 (Figs 181–185) Lymaenon Walker, 1846: 49. Type species: Lymaenon acuminatus Walker, 1846, by subsequent designation by Gahan & Fagan, 1923: 82. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Lymaenon is distinguished from the other genera of Gonatocerini by the following combination: ocellar triangle with 3 or, rarely, 4 setae between lateral ocelli (Fig. 181b); pronotal lobes separated by a usually membranous gap (Fig. 184); mesothoracic spiracle much larger than propodeal spiracle (Fig. 184); dorsellum strap-like, with anterior and posterior margins parallel (Fig. 184); stigmal vein with apex truncate (Fig. 183); propodeum with parallel or slightly converging submedian lines (Fig. 184), often with spicules between them. Remarks. Lymaenon belongs to the Gonatocerus group of genera, treated formally as Gonatocerini (Huber 2015a). The metanotum with straight and parallel anterior and posterior margins is characteristic though a few species of Cosmocomoidea have the metanotum narrow, with almost parallel anterior and posterior margins. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important references. Huber (2015a), Triapitsyn et al. (2015).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".