Bibliographic record
Abstract
239 Euura longiserra (Thomson, 1863) Figs 257, 497 Nematus longiserra Thomson, 1863: 632. Lectotype designated by Saarinen (1948). Nematus leucodous Zaddach, 1884 in Brischke 1884: 132. Holotype ♂, probably destroyed (Blank & Taeger 1998). Type locality: Russia, Kaliningradskaya oblast, Wohlfr.-Zinten [Kornevo]. Synonymy by Konow (1890). Diagnosis The usually almost completely orange body (but sometimes dorsally extensively black), and pronounced and broad papilliform serrulae distinguish the females from the others in the longiserra group. Based on penis valves, males might not be clearly distinguishable from E. munda and E. neglecta, but sternum 9 might usually (?) be black in E. longiserra (pale in E. munda and E. neglecta). Type material examined Lectotype Nematus longiserra SWEDEN – Skåne • ♀; Kungsmarken, Södra Sandby; 55.72° N, 13.34° E; MZLU, MZLU2017292. Host plants Salix aurita, S. caprea (Zinovjev & Vikberg 1998), S. cinerea (Roller & Macek 2017; this study), and S. starkeana. Genetics COI Based on 6 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.91% and the nearest neighbours, diverging by a minimum of 0%, are Euura eiteli (DEI-GISHym84213), E. munda, and E. neglecta. Nuclear Based on 6 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.3% (0.39% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.47%, is Euura neglecta. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Bulgaria, Finland, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".