Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Cerodontha Rondani, 1861 Cerodontha Rondani, 1861: 10. TYPE SPECIES. — Chlorops denticornis Panzer, 1806 REMARKS The genus Cerodontha is classified into seven subgenera (Butomomyza Nowakowski, 1967, Cerodontha, Dizygomyza Hendel, 1920, Icteromyza Hendel, 1931, Phytagromyza Hendel, 1920, Poemyza Hendel, 1931, and Xenophytomyza Frey, 1946). All subgenera have been recorded in the Neotropical region, except for Phytagromyza, which is exclusively Holarctic. The species are quite variable externally, but the male genitalia is characteristic with a well-developed mesophallus and long tubular distiphallus. In addition, all species in the genus Cerodontha have in common an L-shape sclerite inside the epandrium (the subepandrial sclerite or “Langfortsatz” of previous authors). A single specimen of Cerodontha was collected on the Mitaraka massif and belongs to the subgenus Dizygomyza. This subgenus is characterized by a large lunule and typically an enlarged first flagellomere in the male, although there are a few exceptions, including the new species described below.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".