Bibliographic record
Abstract
CALLODICOPUS Ogloblin, 1955 (Figs 50–54) Callodicopus Ogloblin, 1955c: 377. Type species: Callodicopus crassula Ogloblin, 1955, by original designation. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Funicle 7-segmented (Fig. 51), with fu 2 sometimes much shorter than fu 1 or fu 3; mandibles with 2 equal teeth and crossing when closed (Fig. 50a); occiput separated from gena/postgena by transverse vertexal trabecula just dorsal to foramen magnum (Fig. 50b); mesophragma projecting slightly into gaster; fore wing gradually widening towards apex, with posterior margin straight (Fig. 52); gt 1 about same length as each following tergum (Fig. 54a). Remarks. Callodicopus is placed in the Alaptus group of genera due to its wide propodeal foramen with the mesophragma projecting slightly through it into the gaster but the back of the head with a faint median (vertical) coronal line closely resembles members of the Camptoptera group of genera. The length of fu 2 varies; in some cases it is so short that the antenna appears to have only 6 funicle segments. Males flagellum 10-segmented with fl 2 ring-like. Huber & Lin (1999) had also included Callodicopus in Camptoptera group but, on balance of features, particularly the mesophagma projecting into the gaster, Callodicopus fits better in the Alaptus group rather than the Camptoptera group in which the mesophragma does not project through the petiole into the gaster. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important references. Ogloblin (1955c), Huber & Lin (1999).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".