Bibliographic record
Abstract
GAHANOPSIS Ogloblin, 1946 (Figs 136–140) Gahanopsis Ogloblin, 1946: 286 (as subgenus of Lymaenon). Type species: Lymaenon (Gahanopsis) deficiens Ogloblin, 1946, by original designation. Synonymy under Gonatocerus by Triapitsyn et al., 2010: 11 and treated as subgenus; given generic status by Huber, 2015a: 21. Diagnosis. Occiput with transoccipital sulcus complete, extending from below each eye to dorsal margin of foramen (Fig. 136); propodeum divided medially by a vertical longitudinal sulcus then diverging laterally along posterior margin of metanotum and separating the two sclerites by a distinct gap almost as far as spiracle (Fig. 139); metasoma anteriorly usually closely appressed against mesosoma so petiole often hidden; ovipositor and sheaths projecting anteriorly in narrow gastral sac ventral to the mesosoma (Fig. 140b) almost as far as level of head. Remarks. Gahanopsis belongs to the Gonatocerus group of genera. Gastrogonatocerus is the only other genus of Gonatocerini with the petiole projecting anteriorly under the mesosoma but the gastral sac is much slenderer in Gahanopsis. Gahanopsis has a distinctly different propodeal structure. Neotropical hosts. Hemiptera. Important references. Triapitsyn et al. (2010), Huber (2015a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".