Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tribe Chaetostomatini Fowler, 1958 Included genera. Andeancistrus Lujan et al., 2015b:652. Type-species: Chaetostomus platycephalus Boulenger, 1898. Chaetostoma Tschudi, 1846:25. Type-species: Chaetostomus loborhynchos Tschudi, 1846. Synonyms: Hypocolpterus Fowler, 1943, Lipopterichthys Norman, 1935, and Loraxichthys Salcedo, 2013. Cordylancistrus Isbrücker, 1980:48. Type-species: Pseudancistrus torbesensis Schultz, 1944. Dolichancistrus Isbrücker, 1980:47. Type-species: Pseudancistrus pediculatus Eigenmann, 1918 [a junior synonym of Dolichancistrus fuesslii (Steindachner, 1911]. Leptoancistrus Meek, Hildebrand, 1916:254. Type-species: Acanthicus canensis Meek & Hildebrand, 1913. Transancistrus Lujan et al., 2015b:657. Type-species: Cordylancistrus santarosensis Tan & Armbruster, 2012. Phylogenetic diagnosis. Anterior edge of the anterohyal sinusoidal (2:1, reversed in Cordylancistrus torbesensis and Dolichancistrus cobrensis), mesial facing process on branchiostegal 3 (6:1, unique), reversal to a large interhyal (27:0), long opercular condyle of the hyomandibula (38:1), tall levator arcus palatini crest (44:2), mesial wall of metapterygoid channel much taller than lateral wall (55:1, reversed in Cordylancistrus torbesensis), ventral process on quadrate for articulation with canal plate (65:1), wide, blunt articular condyle of quadrate (67:1), bar-shaped opercle (75:2), maximum forward position of opercle to posterolateral corner of the quadrate (77:1, reversed in Andeancistrus and some Chaetostoma), canal plate covered in skin or plates and not directly supporting odontodes (84:1, unique), tall ridge on lateral ethmoid for contact with metapterygoid (97:2), mesethmoid flares anteriorly (102:1), eight or more dorsal-fin rays (142:1), nuchal plate covered by skin or plates (147:1, nuchal plate may be exposed and supporting odontodes in nuptial male Dolichancistrus), reversal to a large space between posterior process of coracoid strut and posterior process of coracoid (164:0), reversal to tall ventral ridge of pelvic basipterygium (172:0), and widened first (unbranched) ray of pelvic fin (177:1, reversed in Dolichancistrus). Comparative diagnosis. Chaetostomatini can be separated from all other Hypostominae except Acanthicini, Collosimystax new genus, and Pterygoplichthys by having eight or more branched dorsal-fin rays (vs. seven); from Acanthicini and Pterygoplichthys by lacking elongate patches of sharp odontodes on lateral plate keels (most species lack lateral plate keels entirely, Andeancistrus platycephalus and Chaetostoma spondylus have round patches of elevated, keel-like odontodes on lateral plates); from Collosimystax new genus by mature males having usually zero and maximally two cheek odontodes extending past the head (vs.>40), and by having plates in ventral series posterior to anal fin broadly convex (vs. dorsal halves of plates concave, forming a strong keel); and from Pterygoplichthys by lacking plates on abdomen (vs. abdominal plates present), and by having caudal fin truncate or maximally emarginate (vs. forked). Geographical distribution. Most species with exclusively Andean distribution, including cis-Andean streams from southern Peru to the Caribbean Andes west of Caracas (including the Caribbean slope) and trans-Andean basins from the Tumbes River in Northern Peru to the Chagres River of Panamá. Three species of Chaetostoma occur in scattered drainages east of the Andes, such as the Caroni, Caura, and Branco rivers draining the Guiana Shield north in Venezuela and south in Brazil, and a few northern and southern tributaries of the lower Amazon in Brazil (Meza-Vargas et al., 2022).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".