Plukenetia brachybotrya Mull. Arg., Linnaea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
9. PLUKENETIA BRACHYBOTRYA Müll.Arg., Linnaea 34: 158. 1865. Apodandra brachybotrya (Müll.Arg.) J.F.Macbr., Publ. Field Columb. Mus., Bot. Ser., 13 (3a, 1): 117. 1951. TYPE: PERU. Peruvia, “ Herb. Pavon ” [likely H. Ruiz & J. Pavón s.n.] (holotype: G-BOIS! [barcode G00441995]; isotypes: G! [barcode G00441996], G-DC! [barcode G00313654]). Plukenetia buchtienii Pax, Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 7: 110. 1909. Apodandra buchtienii (Pax) Pax & K.Hoffm. in A.Engler (ed.), Pflanzenr. IV, 147, IX (Heft 68): 21. 1919. TYPE: BOLIVIA. Charopompa bei Mapiri, 570 m, November 1907, O. Buchtien 1962 (lectotype designated by Gillespie 1993: US! [accession 1175161, barcode 00096450]; isolectotypes: NY! [barcode 00273178], Z [barcode Z-000019739; image!]). Notes —See Gillespie (1993) for species discussion. Müller cited the protologue of P. brachybotrya as “hb. Pavon! in hb. Boiss.” suggesting the holotype was a Pavon collection housed in Boissier’ s herbarium. Given that there is only one such sheet in Boissier’ s herbarium (now housed at G), we maintain that it is a holotype and not in need of lectotypification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".